View more on these topics

Investment view

While relaxing in sunnier climes than those available to us in these rain-sodden shores the other week, I found myself reading a local English language newspaper aimed at both expatriates and tourists.

The expatriate focus was very clear. There was an article by an IFA on how those living on this particular island might invest for income and this was no offshore specialist, at least so far as I could tell. Perhaps it would be fairer to say that the name at the foot of the article was not one I recognised as being from a firm which conducted significant business in the expat market. Whatever the writer&#39s level of expertise, two points struck me about the content.

First, the income-producing asset was a commercial property fund. Nothing wrong with that but it reminded me how much emphasis is presently being placed on property investment. The whole property scene is changing dramatically as far as investors are concerned. In 18 months time, residential property will be eligible for inclusion in Sipps. With the advent of property investment funds, too, there seems bound to be an upsurge of interest in property for the foreseeable future.

The second point was that this was a sterling-based inv-estment for people who were living in the eurozone. No doubt, many of the residents of this particular far-flung outpost of the European Union still thought primarily in pounds and pence and felt more comfortable with sterling than any other investment currency. The reality, though, is that a mismatch between assets and liabilities would potentially be created.

These days, of course, the global nature of business means that many investments are likely to have some cross-border currency influences. There are plenty of constituents of the FTSE 100 index that derive by far the greater majority of their profits in currencies other than sterling. Even so, to ignore the effect of currency movements in investment planning can be a foolhardy exercise. Nowhere is this more true than in the field of borrowing.

In the past, the purchasers of UK assets funding their deals through borrowing in lower interest rate currencies have often come unstuck through the currency movement. I well recall a fashion for Swiss franc mortgages to finance UK property purchases because Swiss interest rates were a quarter of those in the UK. The amount of money lost on the currency movement far outweighed the interest saving.

When investing, the pitfalls are not as great but they exist. Retiring to sunnier climes on a sterling pension but a cost of living paid for in euros is fine as long as the relationship between the two is stable. If sterling slides against the euro, though, you could find your standard of living eroded simply because your pound buys fewer goods in your adopted country.

And the pound is sliding at present. The change in the relationship has not been great but the euro has slowly been creeping up against both sterling and the dollar. In the case of the UK, the belief that the interest rate cycle may be peaking early is principally to blame but the fear that Gordon Brown may increase borrowing to finance Government expenditure rather than for investment will also be causing concern.

Certainly, expenditure is rising faster than expected while public sector investment remains relatively muted. Not only is the prospect of higher borrowing of concern to holders of sterling, it raises the spectre of rising taxes as well.

You only have to look at the behaviour of the dollar to realise that government deficits are not good for the currency. Last week saw the US dollar slide to fresh lows against the euro. There were rumours that Asian central banks were switching out of the dollar into the single European currency, perhaps to help stave off any consequences of a Chinese revaluation but US borrowing is a concern.

This close to the American presidential election makes is hard to see what a US administration might do about its ballooning deficits but Government borrowing will be close to currency traders&#39 thinking in the months ahead.


Prudential plans compensation for poor service

Prudential is planning a system where it could make payments to advisers if service standards are not met. As part of a major service overhaul, the company says firms could receive compensation for poor service in the same way that pizza delivery operations give free pizzas where deliveries are late. As part of its preparation […]

Bond failings cost Capita £300k fine

The FSA has hit Capita Trust Company, formerly Royal & Sun Alliance Trust Company, with a £300,000 fine for misselling precipice bonds. It says the company advised a total of around 500 clients to invest in a variety of precipice bonds between June 1997 and September 2002 and these clients suffered losses which totalled around […]

Steve Bee on Pensions

The Pensions Commission report highlighted the fact that we face hard choices in dealing with the consequences of an ageing population. It seems that society must choose between poorer pensioners, higher taxes, working longer and saving more. The report acknowledges that accepting poorer pensioners is unlikely to be an attractive option and that a mix […]

Premier Mortgage Services md says be positive on regulation

Premier Mortgage Solutions md John Malone says the industry should take the positive view on regulation. He says anything that promotes such a big change is bound to create some problems – especially with the new technology systems. Malone says the market looks as if it is slowing down and the lenders and inermediaries will […]

Managing customers in drawdown

By Lorna Blyth, Investment Marketing Manager Delivering a decent drawdown review process takes time and resources. This article looks at how you can manage drawdown clients in a more cost-effective way. Most advisers are seeing an increase in drawdown clients following pension freedoms. Often these are clients with lower fund sizes, which means advisers are […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment