View more on these topics

Investment view

What constitutes a “safe” investment? If you are an investor, what does “safe” look like? I was put in mind of the way in which the concept of “safe” will vary from person to person by comments from Michael Hughes at the Skandia/Gerrard IFA seminar in Essex.

In response to a question on how to construct a personal pension portfolio, he suggested that a significant proportion should be committed to index-linked bonds. The act-ual percentage, in his view, could be equivalent to the age of the person building the pension pot. In other words, a 50-year-old might put 50 per cent into these bonds.

Index-linked bonds have been around for a little while but the number and variety of them is increasing rapidly at present. Several countries now have these bonds in issue. In part, this is a consequence of the rising level of government indebtedness in the Western world. Government borrowing needs to be financed. The attraction of funding expenditure through index-linked securities is that interest costs are, initially at any rate, relatively low. The disadvantage, of course, is that they can rise over time while the fact that redemption values will be linked to the rise in the cost of living means that inflation cannot erode the value of the debt.

Before the first index-linked bonds were issued in this country, I remember taking part in a debate on whether or not we, as professional investors, would be prepared to buy them if they were available. The overall conclusion was that, if the Government was issuing them, we probably should not be buyers. This was, after all, a time when inflation had been very high – more than 20 per cent in the mid 1970s – but was falling. The attraction to us was the guaranteed bailout if high inflation persisted. The price we would pay was a low interest coupon and if the Government was prepared to guarantee redemption values that reflected the rise in the cost of living, the chances were that they did not expect this guarantee to prove unduly onerous.

Of course, low inflation means low interest rates so the yield on conventional bonds did fall to closer to the income return on index-linked. Interestingly, Michael Hughes did focus in on the varying experiences for investors during times of rising inflation and disinflation – two periods of almost equal length that commenced in about 1960. The main difference between the two was that equities produced positive returns in both scenarios while conventional bonds only prospered during disinflation. This period of disinflation may, as it happens, have come to an end this year. Not that rising inflation is about to hit us. Rather, a period of relative stability looks in prospect.

But to return to the question of what constitutes “safe”, can government-issued index-linked bonds really fall into this category? For a start, you have to look at the small print if you are buying a complex product such as this from a government. According to Baring&#39s chief investment officer, legislation is already in prospect to amend the terms under which new index-linked bonds are issued, changing the inflation measure to HICP – the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices. This may bring us into line with the Eurozone but, because property is excluded, lower guaranteed returns will be delivered than would have been available from the retail price index, under which existing bonds have been issued. This could, it is true, change, but it is worth bearing in mind.

“Safe”, too, is a concept that can vary over time. Building society and bank deposit accounts might have been considered “safe” but were they really in the dark days of the mid-1970s when inflation eroded their true worth far faster than the income generated could compensate? Indeed, I am forced to the conclusion that no investment may truly be considered safe for all time. Even conventional government bonds can have their coupons varied.

As for “safe as houses”, anyone who experienced the bear market in residential property during the early 1990s will understand that risks are present here also. In the end, it is spreading over a range of assets that gives you the greatest security. As to whether that is a “safe” approach, it depends on your point of view. No wonder assessing an investor&#39s attitude to risk is considered so important these days. I only hope that investors themselves understand what is really meant by “risk” and “safe” in a fast-moving investment environment.

Recommended

Cofunds sees growth in Isa sales

Cofunds has reported total sales of £445m in ISAs, PEPs and investment funds for the second quarter of 2004. The fund supermarket has also seen a 10 per cent increase in Isa sales in the first quarter of the year. Cofunds marketing director Rick Andrews says: “It just goes to show that we are delivering […]

Product providers are set to ditch IFA subsidy

Product providers are unlikely to continue to subsidise IFAs&#39 Financial Services Compensation Scheme levy next year because of the changes brought by depolarisation. Negotiations are under way between providers and Aifa to extend the subsidy but Money Marketing understands that it is unlikely to be renewed. Three years ago, the FSA decided that it was […]

&#39HBOS would axe Abbey brand and cut public choice&#39

An HBOS takeover of Abbey would see the Abbey brand disappearing and would be bad for consumer choice, says Charcol senior technical manager Ray Boulger. He believes if HBOS were successful, it would mean an end to the 60-year-old Abbey brand. He points to the fact that HBOS has five brands with Halifax, Bank of […]

Lay blame at the right door

Are you not just fed up of the disproportionate criticism of the IFA sector with: •Misselling, over 80 per cent of which is attributable to the tied sector. •Misinformed criticism of fund-based trail commission. With defined-contribution pension provision in the private sector, how does the Treasury select committee expect the essential ongoing advice to be […]

Retirement fund - thumbnail

What price (more) freedoms?

George Osborne will make his last Budget speech of the current parliamentary term this week, and the early media briefings suggest that pensions will again feature heavily in that statement. So what are we able to learn from the weekend’s coverage?

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com