View more on these topics

Insurers pledge action on ‘excessive’ renewal premiums

Medical insurance - thumbnailThe Association of British Insurers and the British Insurance Brokers’ Association have announced new guidelines to ensure long-standing customers are treated fairly compared to new ones.

There is often a difference in premiums between new and existing customers, but the trade bodies say their new commitment should result in “an improvement in the outcomes for long-standing customers” across home, motor and travel insurance.

The guidelines include not supporting “excessive” differences between new customer and renewal premiums, making sure that shopping around at renewal does not foster excessive pricing differences, and clarifying to customers that premium rates may only be low for the first year and will rise thereafter.

ABI chairman Andy Briggs tells the BBC: “The renewal market simply doesn’t work where loyal customers get charged much more than new customers.

“Given many consumers expect to get cheaper insurance when they shop around, there is no easy solution.”

Citizens Advice research suggests long-standing home insurance customers could be paying at least £100 a year more on average than new customers.

Chief executive Gillian Guy says: “The devil…will be in the detail – whether this is successful will depend on prices actually coming down for loyal customers.

“The industry should also work with the FCA to collect better data on the scale of this loyalty penalty. Then we can assess whether this unfair practice is being tackled effectively.”

Recommended

Steve Bee
57

Steve Bee: Why still no justice for Waspi women?  

For calls for change to still be falling on deaf ears in 2018 is beyond disappointing There is a serious issue with our pension system today that has been allowed to continue for many years with no resolution. Over 20 years ago, the government decided to require millions of older people in the future to […]

Magnifying-Glass-And-Text-Kindle-Contract-700x450.jpg
6

FOS penalises adviser over not reviewing Ucis investments

An adviser must compensate a client for failing to monitor the performance of Sipp investments in two unregulated collective investment schemes. A Financial Ombudsman Service decision says Welsh advice firm Sebastian & St James International Financial Advisers is responsible for the reduction in the client’s pension. In October 2011 the client, Mr P, met an […]

Money-Cash-Coins-GBP-Pounds-UK-700x450.jpg
96

How much are advisers charging for pension transfers?

Defined benefit pension transfer charges are being put under the microscope again as the regulator turns over more potential conflicts of interest. With the British Steel Pension Scheme the latest to dominate headlines and the FCA ready to interrogate further as it extends its review to include all firms authorised to give pension transfer advice, […]

3

When will ESG take off with advisers?

The buzz around sustainable and ethical investing has been growing in recent years as more people become environmentally and socially aware. In response, asset managers such as Schroders, Investec and Aegon have all jumped on the bandwagon and are pushing a vast array of funds with an ethical dimension as the appetite for responsible investment […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Philip Castle 9th May 2018 at 10:03 am

    It always was a breach of TCF principles IMHO, but the FCA have appeared to tudn a blind eye when providers are concerend rather than advisers.
    Fair or unfair comment FCA?

    Admission of a systemic TCF breach, FCA please investigate.

    ABI chairman Andy Briggs tells the BBC: “The renewal market simply doesn’t work where loyal customers get charged much more than new customers.

Leave a comment