View more on these topics

Insistent client transfers accepted by 70% of providers


The vast majority of pension firms will accept transfers from customers going against the recommendation of an adviser all or some of the time, FCA data reveals.

According to the regulator’s survey of 107 pension providers, published today, 61 per cent said they would accept transfers from insistent clients in certain circumstances, while 9 per cent said they always would.

This figure rises to 77 per cent for the 15 largest providers.

The FCA says firms refusing transfers gave two main reasons: where a transfer was concerned with a defined benefit pension or other safeguarded benefits, and where transfers were not facilitated by an adviser.

In addition, firms said they blocked transfers when investments were considered unsuitable for a Sipp, due diligence conflicts were found, occupational transfers were involved, and where the adviser “could not show adherence to FCA guidance”.

The regulator adds it found most firms who said they would never or only in certain circumstances accept insistent clients, do not ask whether the client is going against a recommendation.

It says: “If a customer is able to find an adviser willing to act on their behalf it is likely that providers will accept the transfer.”

The FCA published guidance for advisers on dealing with insistent clients in June.



Sipp firms split over insistent clients

The Sipp market is split over how to deal with so-called insistent clients who want to transfer out of defined benefit schemes. Despite FCA guidance published in June, advisers and providers remain concerned over the potential for future claims on pension transfers. According to data collected by the regulator as part of the Treasury’s probe […]

Pensions-savings-retirement-piggy bank

Peter Herd: The trouble with insistent clients

I run a small IFA practice and, like many consultants, I receive quite a few phone calls around the subject of transferring defined benefit schemes to Sipps. This could well be another misselling scandal and puts advisers like us in a difficult position. The insistent clients dilemma boils down to who is liable not only […]


Ian Cockerill: How to handle insistent clients

While the politicians, media and individual pension holders seem enthusiastic about the idea of freedom and choice, it appears the regulator is less keen. Those of us who lived through the pensions scandal of the late-1980s will remember that the government that suggested and allowed changed in the first place (including a “free the chains” […]


Nick Bamford: Be an ‘insistent adviser’ and just say no

The debate about the cost to consumers of the freedom and choice in pension changes continues. According to at least one national newspaper, consumers are being ripped off by product provider charges, forced to pay exorbitant adviser fees and denied access to their pension pots by the barriers created by said pot providers. So much […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Good luck when the proverbial hits the fan a few years down the line.

Leave a comment