View more on these topics

Inside edge

I am not sure that I agree with the commonly held view that the only alternative to final-salary or defined-benefit schemes is for employers to switch to groupings of personal pensions or stakeholder pensions instead. That is a step-change for many bigger employers that could be difficult for them to sell to their employees.

That is not to say, by the way, that I go along with that other great media favourite, the demonising of defined-contribution schemes. It is just that I think that the bigger defined-benefit schemes were set up for a purpose in the first place and the reasons for employers retaining at least some of the risks associated with pension provision for their staff are probably still valid and should not be ignored.

What happens with traditional defined-benefit schemes is that all the certainties are with the employees and all the uncertainties lie with the employer. As an employee, you know exactly what your pension will be related to your earnings at or near retirement and your length of service.

The employer, on the other hand, has no idea what this benefit promise will eventually cost. The two main risks being run are those of the investment return and the future cost of annuities. The argument is that these two risks are getting too difficult for employers to underwrite, so they should both be passed on to employees instead. Well, that is one way of looking at it but there is another.

Many people are now saying that there may be a soft landing somewhere between the traditional defined-benefit approach and the grouping of individual defined-contribution products and that, for many bigger employers, other options may suit their businesses better. Essentially, these options all move some of the risk or cost of the pension scheme to employees but leave the employer still bearing some of the risk too.

A good example of this – and one that has become quite popular in the US as it, too, has moved away from its traditional approach to defined-benefit provision – is where the employer passes the risks associated with annuity purchase on to employees but retains the investment risk. These schemes are sometimes referred to as cash benefit schemes and are essentially defined-benefit arrangements where the defined benefit is a certain amount of cash provided at retirement for the purpose of annuity purchase. For example, an employer could set up a defined-benefit scheme to provide a fixed sum of, say, 10 times salary at the time of retirement, which the employee could then use to purchase an annuity.

This approach provides the employee with a good level of security as far as knowing the exact amount of funds that can be counted on in the future but does not commit the employer to also underwriting future annuity rates. Such schemes are already popping up over here in the UK and I think they will become more common over time.

It seems to me that there is a good case for employers looking to their employees to contribute more towards the costs of provision if maintaining the generous final-salary benefit levels is what suits both the employer and employees. That is not to say that they should both bear half the cost but there is a case for increased employee commitment being the price for keeping schemes going where an employer is still prepared to underwrite both the investment and annuity risks.

Again, we are seeing many companies taking this route. Of course, this gives rise to some of the sillier stories in the press about employers going back on their promises and such but, hey, we are getting used to those by now, aren&#39t we?

In reality, employers and employees are starting to look at the pension realities together and coming up with bespoke solutions that work in their particular circumstances. Our pension environment is changing, yes, but it is not as simple as DB or DC.

In my view, our future is not that polarised, even if it does make for more dramatic newspaper stories.

Steve Bee is head of pension strategy at Scottish Life


GE backs Women&#39s IFA Group

Retirement planning specialist GE Life has signed a sponsorship deal with the Women&#39s IFA group. Wig was set up by Fiona Price three years ago and now has 650 members. It is established in eight locations across the UK and runs quarterly meetings. The GE sponsorship will mean the non-profit group will be able to […]

The real meal ticket

The defined-payment system proposed in CP121 is gone and its replacement, the menu option, will soon take its place. As IFAs wait to find out exactly what is on the menu in the coming months, some are recognising that it is really just the start of the end for the traditional IFA practice as we […]

Revenue blocks way for DB victims

The Inland Revenue is using the partial concurrency rule to stop people whose final-salary schemes have closed from making alternative retirement provision. The Revenue has ruled that members of final-salary schemes closed to future accruals fall under partial concurrency regulations because their benefits grow as their salary increases. The Revenue says members will be treated […]

Intelligent Finance is set to hit break-even

Intelligent Finance says it is close to reaching its target of break-even after three years in business with net lending hitting £2bn in the first half of this year. Launched in November 2000, the tele-net bank saw losses of £38m in the first half of this year but this was an improvement on the £147m […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm