View more on these topics

The strange new world of Mifid II inducement rules

“Dear Steve. You are cordially (but professionally) invited (well, you will have to pay for half of it) to attend our forthcoming conference (and please expunge any previous association you may have with the word – this is, I assure you, nothing of the sort) on tax planning.

“To elaborate (and by this we mean provide more hard facts, rather than anything more extravagant) on the previous bracketed explanation, we can confirm that any idle pleasure you may have enjoyed at previous events (tut, tut, Steve, did the client benefit from your titillation?) will have no place at this strictly business affair.

“If you would like to attend, then I have enclosed a client benefit consideration form for you to complete to ensure nothing, save the client’s best interests, are at the heart of this decision.

“Before returning this form to us, please remember that you will only be cheating the client and, ultimately, yourself if a full disclosure of your motivations is not provided.

“We will not be angry, more disappointed. There is, though, no legislating for how your regulator may respond, as at this stage they prefer to not offer any more clarity on the matter.

“You will be required to present a signed copy of this document at the door on the morning of the event where our head of fun police will take this, and your general countenance (dank attire, solemn mood recommended), into consideration before permitting your entrance.

Note that trousers unduly tapered may be taken as a sign of your intent to carry excessive ‘swagger’ into proceedings, which may, in turn, avert the focus of others in the room from our raison d’etre: better client outcomes.”

Some party, hey? But, like it or not, that is how we roll in the new world. According to Article 24(9) of Mifid II, an investment firm is only permitted to pay or be paid an inducement (namely, a fee, commission or non-monetary benefit) in connection with the provision of an investment service or ancillary service where the relevant payment:

1: Is designed to enhance the quality of the relevant service to a client of the investment firm; and

2: Does not impair compliance with the investment firm’s duty to act honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of its clients.

Will this help create better outcomes? I do not know. But it will certainly make the world a slightly duller place.

Phil Wickenden is managing director at Cicero Research


FCA logo glass 620x430

FCA warns firms over continued failures on inducements

Firms providing hospitality for advisers are falling short of inducement and conflict of interest rules, the FCA says. The regulator’s response to its 2015 thematic review of 23 providers, advisers and asset managers, published today, warns some advice firms are receiving payments from providers that exceed the cost of training and other activity. In addition, […]

Old Mutual Wealth 2014

Intrinsic loans ‘could breach FCA inducements rules’

Advice firms accepting loans from Intrinsic under its practice buyout scheme should be wary of breaching the FCA’s inducement rules, say compliance experts. It is understood the FCA has written to providers to request details of any loan arrangements they have with advice firms. Last month, Intrinsic announced it will make loans available to appointed […]


SJP under fire again over charges and exit fees

Clients of St James’s Place have attacked the firm over what they say is an opaque charging structure and punitive levels of exit fees. The Sunday Times was asked to examine what retired solicitor Arnold Rosen had been charged by SJP between 2009 and 2015 after Rosen could not work out the level of charges […]


Dashboard control in question as Govt discusses next steps

The dashboard prototype was delivered to Government in March Responsibility for the pensions dashboard could soon pass from the Treasury to the Department for Work and Pensions, Money Marketing understands, in a move set to be welcomed by the industry. While the DWP only says it is considering the next steps on the idea and […]

US election

Capital Market Notes, November 2016 David Lafferty, chief market strategist at Natixis Global Asset Management, looks at the impact on markets and portfolios since the somewhat surprising outcome of the US election. Click here


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. What a daft article. The MiFID inducement rules aren’t radically different from what’s in force already.

  2. “Will this help create better outcomes? I do not know.”

    I guess that would depend on whether advisers act “honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of their clients” or not.

    “But it will certainly make the world a slightly duller place.”

    If the only gaiety in your world comes from going on free golf jollies in exchange for flogging sub-standard investment products then it’s high time MIFID forced you to get a life. Take up a hobby, learn a new language, spend some time with the kids.

Leave a comment