View more on these topics

Independent View

In conversation with a representative of the FSA, we touched on the

subject of greater professionalism. One of the bees in my toupee. Do you

really want to attain the now rather tainted image of the “professions”?

Bearing in mind the medical and legal scandals plus the militant approach

of some of the teaching unions, I would have thought some other standard

would be preferable. Such was the general drift of his comments.

This set me to thinking. It is true “the professions” are not held in the

same esteem as they were 40 years ago. The idea that a doctor, lawyer or

teacher could be anything other than a person of integ-rity and a pillar of

society is pretty outmoded.

So why is this hangover from a previous age still a sought after image? I

think it is because, in spite of adverse publicity, the general expectation

is still positive.

In the various locations in which we all operate, I am sure you can

think of individuals in all walks of life who are not “professional”

in their approach.

What we all need to do is to improve the general expectation of the

quality of service provided by the financial services industry.

While regulation has a role in this, there is no doubt the primary

motivation should come from public pressure.

During a visit to one of the very best residential care homes I have seen,

I talked to the owner about current regulation and how it might change in

the future.

He looked me straight in the eye and asked me if our regulators could

possibly find out what we were like from their standard inspections. He

took the view that any business which failed such a visit was doubly

incompetent.

There is no substitute for hard probing from relatives (or clients). Tough

questioning and surprise calls at awkward times. “Abseil down the walls at

three in the morning” were his actual words.

Careful scrutiny of emp- loyee relations and pertinent questions relating

to their contracts of service may be more practical.

The British are generally very poor at this and it is one of the reasons

competition is not as effective as in the US, where expectations are much

higher. If high standards are possible from one supplier, why are they not

possible from all?

It struck me that this was also true of financial serv- ices. You may

believe you provide a top-quality service but it is not your judgement

that is important.

Clients are the real jud- ges, not the regulators. However, this judgement

is made almost impossible if what we provide is not presented clearly and

openly.

Very few clients leave us. When they do, we count this a dreadful failure

on our part. In most cases, it is a failure to be understood rather than a

failure to produce results.

Regulation would be less necessary (and less costly) if consumers were

more prone to accept the prime responsibility for obtaining the best

products or services lies with then and not some outside agency. The

tendency to look for scapegoats when we suffer loss is still very

prevalent. “Who pays? Not me” is still the cry.

Recently, we have been told that the Institute of Actuaries has requested

Sir John Banham to carry out an investigation into sales practices in

financial services.

Apparently, the institute is concerned that the products it designs may

be missold and its reputation could be tarnished. I was amazed.

Given that it is these very actuaries who gave us such devices as capital

units, which were specifically designed to confuse not just the public but

also the sales channels the insurers use, their reputation is already lost.

It is difficult to misrepresent the transparent and actuaries have also

been less than transparent in the past. The present is not exactly

untainted by opacity. The com- panies take no responsibility for the

quality of the people who independently distribute their products.

There was a saying a few years ago that the insurers were the whores of

financial services. They would get into bed with anyone. Has this changed?

The Institute of Actuaries may be trying to get its retaliation in first

but Sir John is on a failed mission.

Bob Young is director of Wilcox Young Personal Wealth Management

Recommended

Britain is “nation of shareholders” says Schwab

Britain is a nation of shareholders, according to new research for Charles Schwab, the online discount broker.From a sample of 2,000 phone interviews carried out in February, Schwab found 13.5 million Britons have a stockmarket investment of some kind, including shares held directly or unit and investment trusts. A further 2.7 m people have considered […]

Set your sites high

I have recently been contacted by a whole host of organisations which aresetting up services to help IFAs in developing a web presence.I will be examining some of these in more detail on this page in the nearfuture. This week, I would like to look at some of the key issues IFAsshould be considering when […]

Now pension firms have to grow their own decision trees

Pontius Pilate would have blushed.The FSA has decided to wash its hands of decision trees on stakeholderpensions. After months of trying to get something which cannot work towork, it intends to pass responsibility for this tortured piece of timberto the pension companies.The precedent was set by the Government which initially passed the buck tothe FSA. […]

Clock ticks on mis-sold pensions

Millions of people who were mis-sold pensions have until Friday evening to make a claim against their insurance company. Over three million people have had letters asking them if they want to apply for a review of their pension. So far, only one million have replied, raising fears that many people will not get the […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment