View more on these topics

Independent view

Unlike David Icke, I have never been one for conspiracy theories. However, the recent round of announcements by the Treasury and other industry bodies proposing even greater regulation did give me cause to pause for thought.

But after delving yet again into what is becoming my most favoured website to download the detail of the latest Treasury proposals, I realise it is not conspiracy but rather a dangerous mix of ignorance and good intentions.

The Treasury paper, Standards for Retail Financial Products, highlights this only too clearly. The report states that consumers rarely shop around for even the simplest financial products and, once they have made a purchase, are reluctant to switch providers. It also draws attention to a general lack of understanding of charges. Furthermore, a significant number of individuals – some 35 per cent of the sample – believe that past performance is a guide to future performance.

Against this, it cites that, when people have the confidence to choose products and services for themselves, they often do better than those who took advice. The example used to back up this statement is the surrender rate for individuals who bought endowments. I quote: “People who were sold regular-premium endowment policies by company advisers in 1995 were at least a third more likely to have surrendered them four years later than people who bought similar products by choosing for themselves through direct-offer advertisements.”

Nowhere in the report is there any information on how those individuals who sought the advice of an independent financial adviser fared.

True to form, the conclusion drawn is that those who do it themselves do best. Therefore, more effort should be put into consumer education and action taken to foster an environment where financial information is readily available in an easily understood form.

Enter the Cat, the Government&#39s quality mark for certain financial products. We all know what a useful aid to consumers in their purchasing decisions it has proved to be.

Undeterred by the somewhat less than enthusiastic response from the industry to this clawless kitty, the Treasury is proposing inflicting even more of them on us, by far the daftest of which must be a Cat standard for healthcheck financial advice.

Following on from its drive for DIY product purchase, the Government and bodies such as the Consumers&#39 Association think it would be a good idea to offer a fact-finding advice service to identify an individual&#39s needs and then send them off to purchase the product off their own back.

What aid do they have to assist in their product choice? The Cat, of course. Anyone familiar with internet acronyms will understand when I say that, by this point in my reading of the report, I was ROFL (rolling on the floor with laughter). So, the difficult part of the equation is the identification of financial needs whereas product selection is easy for the average consumer? I doubt any of our clients would agree, even if armed with a whole alley full of Cats.

But it gets even better. I would urge anyone starved of a laugh to download this paper now and read pages 40 and 41. I assure you they are good. The report goes on to suggest that a pure advice service need not cover the full needs of the consumer but rather could focus on specific areas. Any good IFA will tell you that advice should be personnot product-specific. Isn&#39t asset mix an important part of planning?

My personal favourite, however, has to be the likening of the purchase of financial products to that of prescription eyewear and comparing the role of adviser to that of optician.

The analogy does not quite work. An optician not only identifies your specific eyesight problem but will also tell you the precise specification of the lenses required to correct it. All that is left for you to do is choose the style of spectacle frame that most suits you or, in the case of contact lenses, the ones which are most comfortable to wear.

If this were translated to financial advice, it would be akin to the adviser identifying their client&#39s needs then recommending the most suitable products for their specific circumstances. Sound familiar?

Yet again, a report has been produced which fails to take account of what is by far the biggest distribution channel for financial products and the value of the service it provides to the consumer, coming up instead with a half-baked proposal aimed at helping the consumer make informed choices.

Taking again the comparison with the purchase of eyewear, I have my own solution. Why not produce policy documents in a large range of textures and colours and let your clients pick their favourites? After all, it fits the logic.

Donna Bradshaw is communications director at Fiona Price & Partners

Recommended

Varying Shades of grey

During the run up to the general election, the campaign teams of all the main parties have been canvassing elderly voters in an attempt to win the all-important grey vote. One of the main reasons for this is that turnout at this election is expected to be dismally low and it would appear that the […]

Aussie loan strengthens IFA armoury

Many might have noticed bizarre ads featuring inverted Australians, kangaroos on mortgage brochures and even certain (unnamed) financial advisers brandishing “G&#39day , Cobber” on their website. The cause of this Antipo-dean overload is the UK arrival of highly flexible and marketable mortgage products developed and imported from Australia. However, does the Australian mortgage revolutionise the […]

Mortgage rate cut aids Nationwide coverage

The switch in media attention from Isas to mortgages during April helped Nationwide Building Society oust Fidelity from the top of PressWatch&#39s media coverage charts last month. PressWatch Financial Products, which monitors UK national media coverage on a monthly basis, says the end of the Isa season saw Fidelity slip to the ninth most mentioned […]

MCCB says code breaches are down

The Mortgage Code Compliance Board says there was a reduction in the number of mortgage code breaches by intermediaries in the six months to January 2001. But the regulator is concerned that a quarter of firms visited by compliance officers failed to provide adequate explanations of the level of service they were providing and internal […]

Mothers missing out on millions

By Steve Webb, director of policy and external communications The ninth Royal London Policy Paper discusses how thousands of mothers are missing out on state pension rights when they don’t have to Earlier this month we published the ninth Royal London Policy Paper, entitled ‘Mothers Missing out on Millions’. It focuses on the thousands of mothers […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com