View more on these topics

Implications of MFR changes

The Chancellor&#39s Response

The Chancellor in his Budget has said that the Government intends to take forward all the recommendations made by Paul Myners. This includes the abolition of the Minimum Funding Requirement.

Other consequences are:



  • Once the principles for institutional decision making are agreed (following further short consultation) pension funds and in due course other institutions will be required to set out publicly whether they comply with the principles. The government will also undertake a review in two years time to see whether the principles bring about any behavioural change


  • The government will legislate to require trustees to be familiar with the investment issues on which they are making decisions


  • The government agrees that it would be helpful if the Law Commission could clarify the position on ownership of surplus


  • The government will legislate to replace the MFR with a long-term scheme – specific funding standard, with additional protective measures for scheme members, including a statutory duty of care for the scheme actuary, stricter rules on voluntary wind up and an extension to the fraud compensation scheme. The Government&#39s proposals for a replacement for the MFR are set out in a document “Security for Occupational Pensions” published on 7 March jointly by the Treasury and the DSS.

There are a number of extremely important changes as a result of the Myners recommendations.


  • It was almost universally agreed that the MFR did not properly fulfil its function to provide protection for scheme members benefits while at the same time unnecessarily imposing additional liabilities on employers offering final salary schemes. It remains to be seen whether the government&#39s proposals will be more effective


  • Being a trustee of an occupational scheme is already an onerous task following the implementation of the Pensions Act 1995 provisions. This will be even more so following the Myners recommendations and there may well be a shortage of applicants for the trustees&#39 jobs. Moreover the costs of implementing the Myners recommendations may significantly increase the administration costs for smaller schemes and may be a further catalyst in the move towards stakeholder pensions


  • It is about time that the question of ownership of surplus funds under a final salary scheme is decided once and for all. Despite numerous court cases the position is still unrestricted. If the result of the Law Commission review is that surplus belongs to the employer this may encourage employers to retain their final salary schemes. However, if the Commission found in favour of the members this would almost certainly herald a stampede of employers looking to convert their final salary schemes to money purchase arrangements.

Recommended

Challenge to prove you are fit for new pensions

Leading pension IFA Informed Choice managing director Nick Bamford is challenging fellow advisers to answer 20 questions, aimed at proving they are fit to advise on stakeholder. With the industry just four weeks away from the official launch of stakeholder on April 6, Bamford says unless IFAs can correctly answer the 20 questions published in […]

UK public don&#39t understand Isas

An overwhelming majority of people in the UK do not know what an Isa is or what the initials stand for, according to research by Self Trade UK. The survey by the online share trader showed 83 per cent of survey respondents did not know what an Isa was, with some suggesting Investment Savings Annuity, […]

&#39Rethink tax on pension credits&#39

Scottish Equitable is calling for the Government to offer a higher incentive to low-income savers by linking the pension credit to the basic tax rate. In its response to the consultation on the proposed pension savings top-up, ScotEq claims the credits equate to a 40 per cent tax rate on the private pension income of […]

Mystery shopping highlights failings, says PIA

The PIA says its mystery shopping exercises show IFAs are failing to make clear distinctions between the benefits of stakeholder and personal pension plans.It also accuses some IFAs of misleading clients by suggesting past performance would be repeated in the future, and were likely to exceed the PIA&#39s highest standard projections.The exercises found cases of […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com