View more on these topics

IMA: Beware of “tidal wave” of financial regulation

The “tidal wave” of European regulation flowing from the financial crisis may prove ultimately damaging to the region’s economy, the chief executive of the IMA argues.

Speaking at The Lawyer magazine’s funds summit in Brussels, Richard Saunders (pictured) said there are about 35 separate legislative measures coming out of the European Commission that will affect the financial services industry.

Saunders highlights the Packaged Retail Investment Products initiative and some elements of the new Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid) as examples of regulation that he says will be ultimately beneficial.

“But others, such as the proposed Financial Transactions Tax (FTT) and some of the detailed provisions in Mifid, will have unintended consequences and will not achieve their objectives,” he asserts.

The speed at which the commission is drafting new legislation is problematic, according to Saunders, as there is insufficient time devoted to ensuring regulations are “right”.

In addition, he claims “mis-placed analysis of the financial crisis” is directing too much regulatory attention towards hedge funds and not enough to banks.

The FTT is one example of this mis-placed effort, Saunders says. He expects the customers will bear the brunt of the tax, rather than the financial institutions it seeks to target.

Allowing the European Securities and Markets Authority to ban short selling will also fail to curb market volatility while adding an extra layer of regulation to investment funds, he adds.

“Much of what is now on the table would be damaging to the EU economy as a whole.”

Saunders’ comments echo criticism by John Cridland, the director-general of the Confederation of British Industry, who says the FTT could damaged the EU’s economic output by as much as €100 billion (£85 billion) a year.

To receive more relevant articles like this one, why not sign up to our briefings and breaking alerts by clicking here.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Pretty much everything the regulators have done since around 1996 has been detrimental to the economy, industry and public.

    The first 10 years of regulation removed most of the rogues and significantly improved business practice. Since then its pretty much been about highly paid jobs for the boys and we’re all getting pretty sick of it.

  2. The industry, or at least the IFA part of it, is already drowning in a quicksand of regulation, not least due to the FSA gold-plating pretty much anything that takes its fancy and building the Canary Wharf Empire to ever more fantastic levels of size, cost and profligacy. All with OPM, of course, and an open licence of freedom from accountability granted by the government. The stuff of nightmares.

Leave a comment