View more on these topics

IFS: Stamp duty changes highlight need for property tax rethink

paul_johnson.jpg

The Institute for Fiscal Studies says the changes to stamp duty announced in the Budget appear “unpremeditated” and bolster the case for wholesale reform of property taxation.

Last week, Chancellor George Osborne announced a new 7 per cent stamp duty band for properties worth over £2m and a 15 per cent band for any property bought through offshore firms.

Giving evidence in front of the Treasury select committee this morning, IFS director Paul Johnson said the policy seemed “unpremeditated” adding it reinforced the case for a review of property taxation.

He said: “It increases substantially the need for reviewing the taxation of property, thinking about the structure of council tax, whether we continue to use 1991 prices, whether we continue to charge it in a way which rises much less proportionally than the value of the property and whether we want to continue with transaction tax which has an impact on how the market works.”

The Treasury says the new 7 per cent rate will hit around 3,000 property sales a year and bring in £200m to £300m. The Office for Budget Responsibility’s economic and fiscal outlook, published alongside the Budget says this estimate is “highly uncertain”. However, Johnson said he has “no basis” for doubting the Treasury’s estimated revenue.

In his Budget speech, Osborne warned he would act “without notice and retrospectively” against people seeking to avoid stamp duty. Chartered Institute of Taxation policy director John Whiting warned that there was a “genuine risk” that retrospective action could become the norm if politicians begin to use it, especially as a way of “correcting lazy legislation”.

He said retrospective action should be kept “in a very very tightly controlled box” as it risked damaging the reputation of the UK tax system and could make inward investment less likely.

He said: “It damages it because it takes away some of the reputation for stability, certainty and fairness that in many ways are the cornerstones of our system.”

Recommended

MMR too focussed on brokers, says BSA

The Building Societies Association has criticised the mortgage market review’s stance on full advice as being too focused on brokers, with lenders an afterthought. It warns that there could be a risk that consumers may become less engaged if they are forced to take advice even if they do not require it and pay less […]

9

Chris Gilchrist: The collapse of financial theories

Most of us have some painful memories of the 2007-08 crunch. It is not surprising that most people in the business are keen to forget and to resume business as usual. This will not happen and if you believe it is happening now, you are heading for trouble. One of the reasons we had the […]

20

FSA refuses to back down on simplified advice

The FSA has refused to relent on its stance on simplified advice, saying it will carry the same liability and have to meet the same qualifications and adviser charging rules as full advice. The regulator has published its final guidance on simplified advice today, following a consultation paper last September. It states the suitability standards […]

Aegon head of corporate media to leave

Aegon head of corporate media Lesley McPherson is leaving the firm after 12 years. McPherson will leave later this year with Mark Locke appointed as head of media relations. McPherson says: “Aegon UK is now in a positive new development phase and I’ve decided it’s the right time for me to seek a new career […]

2017 and the savings landscape…

Anyone who is involved in the world of workplace savings will recognise that the last few months have been rather interesting to say the least. At the start of the year both employers and the pensions industry were braced for major changes to UK pension tax reliefs in the March Budget. Yet shortly before the […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. We need to have a tax on land itself it will raise over 100bn per year and result in more efficient farming leading to less waste and cheaper food it will also free up investment capital to be used for manufacturing or retail development

Leave a comment