View more on these topics

IFAs want ABI to clarify stance on polarisation

IFAs are demanding the ABI clarifies its position on polarisation following the revelation in Money Marketing that its last FSA submission advocated white labelling.

The ABI says the clause on white labelling was included after lobbying from its members. There was no such clause in the original draft submission sent out to life offices.

But providers with IFA sales channels are adamant they backed full polarisation despite ABI claims. White labelling, or gap filling, allows a provider to fill a gap in its range by taking another provider&#39s products and selling them as its own.

Wentworth Rose managing director Philip Rose has written to the ABI saying: “In the light of these contradictory reports, we would ask to be given clarification of the association&#39s position on polarisation and explain how this decision was reached.”

Rose grew concerned after reading of the clause&#39s inclusion in Money Marketing last week. He also points out IFAs look to product providers to support “the advantages of fully independent advice”.

IFAs have also joined Money Marketing in calling for the whole polarisation debate to be held in the public arena.

Last week, Money Marketing launched its Poles Apart campaign and challenged the FSA and Treasury to answer 10 key questions.

Rose&#39s letter says: “If the industry feels that it is necessary for this structure to be re-examined, we call on the ABI to hold this debate in the open so that all concerned can have their say. We hope it is your intention to include all affected parties in the discussion.”

Money Marketing&#39s Poles Apart campaign last week issued 10 questions for the FSA and Treasury which we believe demand answers before the polarisation regime can be changed. This week, we publish the questions again along with a letter written to both Treasury economic secretary Melanie Johnson and FSA chairman Howard Davies outlining the reasons for the campaign. We accept that August may be a bad month to start a campaign but the FSA, for reasons known only to itself, decided to carry out its consultation during the summer. Silly season or not, we will continue to ask our 10 questions until IFAs and consumers get some answers

10 QUESTIONS THAT DEMAND ANSWERS

1: What benefits can multi-ties, product ties, white labelling or depol-arising stakeholder products bring to consumers which the current system fails to deliver?

2: How much will any change cost to implement, who will pay for this change and by what method?

3: What possible changes to stake-holder and Isas could be made to increase the efficiency of distribution without requiring changes to the polarisation regime?

4: What evidence is there to demonstrate a new regime will increase savings levels, especially for pensions?

5: What plans are there for a full public debate before any changes are made?

6: What research has been done to gauge public understanding of the current regime and how quickly they will understand the new set-up?

7: Will a change in the regime risk increasing the incidence of misselling and misbuying and, if so, by how much?

8: Who is ultimately responsible for the decision at the FSA and the Treasury?

9: Is this decision being taken purely on competition or economic grounds, as the London Economics&#39 report suggests, or is the consumer interest to be taken into account?

10: What damage will the options for change, that is, multi-ties, multi-product ties, gap filling or white labelling and depolarising Catmarked or kitemarked products do to the IFA sector over the next five to 10 years?

Recommended

Opponents close to blocking iX merger

The merger of the London and Frankfurt stock exchanges received another blow yesterday when it emerged opponents are approaching the support necessary to block the deal. A new survey from Bloomberg indicates 22 per cent of LSE shareholders will vote against the merger to create the iX Exchange when the vote occurs on September 14. […]

B&B accused of raising rates to influence votes

IFAs claim Bradford & Bingley put up its rates before its conversion vote to convince borrowers that taking a windfall was more attractive than remaining a mutual.Over the past year, variable mortgage rates at B&B have risen to 7.64 per cent from 6.6 per cent. This places B&B above mutual building societies and slightly below […]

Eagle Star endowment holders face 80% hike in premiums

Eagle Star has admitted some of its policyholders face premium hikes of up to 80 per cent to make up potential shortfalls in their endowment policies.IFAs say they have been inundated with letters from Eagle Star informing them that clients are facing increases of up to 80 per cent.The letters mean many clients are having […]

Buy-to-let demand not put off by house price rises

Consumer demand for buy-to-let mortgages is not decreasing despite the rise in property prices throughout the UK, according to a survey from the Association of Residential Letting Agents.The Arla survey says that, although there is a shortage of properties to let in London and the Home Counties, most of the country has a balance between […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment