If you insist…

We consider the progress of the FCA’s Advice Unit as well as the most recent proposed guidance on insistent clients

Advice Unit

Back in March 2016 the Financial Advice Market Review (FAMR) recommended the FCA set up a dedicated team to help firms develop and deliver mass-market automated advice models more quickly. As a result, the Advice Unit was established in May 2016.

It provides regulatory feedback to firms that aim to deliver lower-cost advice, discretionary investment management services to consumers. So far it’s opened two tranches of applications from firms and approved 17 requests.

Initially the Advice Unit was open only to propositions that aimed to cover gaps in the market as identified by the FAMR, namely:

  • Pensions (accumulation & decumulation)
  • Investments
  • Protection

However, it’s since been expanded to also include propositions from firms in the mortgage, general insurance and debt sectors.

Firms that meet the eligibility criteria can request regulatory feedback from the Advice Unit to help where existing rules and guidance provide insufficient detail. Within the Consultation Paper (CP17/28) there are case studies along with questions from those firms within the first two tranches, and the regulator’s response.

Insistent clients

The term ‘insistent client’ is used to describe an individual who has received a personal recommendation but chooses to do something other than follow the adviser’s personal recommendation. The proposals in CP17/28 are designed to increase confidence for advisers and providers when dealing with insistent clients.

The guidance is a follow-up to FCA factsheet 35, which proposed three key steps to dealing with insistent clients, expanding it to a five-step process in CP17/28. The steps are:

  • Ensure the original advice complies with the requirements for giving a personal recommendation.
  • The adviser has communicated clearly what their recommendation is and the reasons for their recommendation.
  • The adviser clearly communicates the risk of the alternative course of action proposed by the client and why they have not recommended it.
  • A clear distinction is made between the advice that is being acted against and any subsequent or concurrent advice. This might be achieved through distinct suitability reports.
  • The adviser keeps a record of the process followed and the communications to and from the client that makes it clear that the action is against the personal recommendation at the client’s request. Best practice would be for a record of the client’s intention to proceed against advice to be in the client’s own words.

Back in August we focused on the changes to the definitions of guidance and advice ahead of their implementation on 3 January 2018. You can read this article here.

Recommended

FCA reveals costs of extending Senior Managers Regime

The FCA has provided further clarity on the £13.4m cost it expects to incur by extending the Senior Managers Regime to all financial services firms, including advisers. Responding to a Freedom of Information Act request, the FCA said that it has budgeted £514,000 – of which it has so far spent £4,000 – for external […]

Piggy-Bank-Savings-UK-700x450.jpg

What the Bank of England rate rise means for pensions

Today’s historic Bank of England rate increase will give pensions a “modest boost” but heralds a warning for those planning to transfer out of their final salary pension. The bank today announced an increase in interest rates from 0.25 per cent to 0.5 per cent; the first rise in a decade. While many pointed to […]

Facing up to Solla’s version of Alan Sugar

My five years are up. Up until now I have been submitting relevant CPD every year but now I am having to completely reapply for my Later Life Adviser Accreditation with the Society of Later Life Advisers. That means getting a lot of ducks in a row for the submission and this week is the […]

Jail banker
2

Former SJP adviser jailed after gambling clients’ money

A former St James’s Place adviser has been jailed after defrauding clients of more than £840,000 over three years. Mark Pickering was discovered to have used client money to place bets at Betfair, which the gambling business discovered after checking its records. Pickering ran up a total of £1.1m gambling losses. Judge James Sampson, of […]

What are the key changes to transform pensions?

By Fiona Tait, pensions specialist In her final article for Royal London, Fiona Tait reviews key changes she believes have transformed, or will transform, pensions. In my 12 years with Royal London I have been paid to review, study and explain the numerous changes to pension legislation which have transformed our industry in that time. This is […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment