View more on these topics

If the wrap fits…

The recent problems at Heathrow left me no option other than to drive to Scotland after British Airways could get me there but not bring me back. All the recent cancellations came as no surprise, having witnessed the understaffed approach to security when last going for a flight at the crack of dawn.

Driving such a distance does allows you to consider issues of the day at your leisure. My personal preference is to listen to talking books as I find music sleep-inducing. But when all of that is played out, my mind begins its gymnastic workout.

Now that A-Day has come and gone, and despite the ongoing shambles at the Treasury regarding alternatively secured pensions, the focus has switched to commission and wraps. The former is currently residing on the too-difficult pile but the latter is certainly making its mark in column inches alone.

But beware. Deciding which wrap to join is not about the ease of setting up and transitioning. It has to be about just how easily we can leave and how long it will take to move the assets to an alternative platform.

As my good friend Peter Mann of Bankhall pointed out, moving all your clients on to a provider wrap will make your client databases vulnerable. Providers often seem to have difficulty in recognising that the IFA is their client. Remember, guys, without us the planholders are temporary residents.

The key attraction of wrap is in that it enables the IFA to capture a greater “share of wallet” and derive savings from using a single platform. This relies on complete trust between the wrap provider and IFA/client.

The IFA needs to be confident that his clients’ data is safe and not likely to be used for marketing while the client will want reassurance that the money is safe. After all, a major insurer is generally far better known than any independent wrap provider and the IFA will need to ensure he has a clear idea of what financial guarantees are in place should the service close down.

For the non-insurer wrap, the main concern will come from the client, where the financial stability and reserves of the wrap provider may not allay any fears. Quite apart from the technological mountain that any new providers have to face, their lack of financial clout may prove to be their undoing.

For the last four years, I have watched the development of the wrap concept in the UK and wondered just how many clients will be prepared to pay more for the same. Unless these platforms start to show some sort of savings, I cannot see what benefit they deliver, especially where their range of funds remains limited.

I heard recently that one platform might use investment performance or lack of it to insist on reduced charges. This is quite mad.

“We will reduce our fees in light of poor investment performance.” The likelihood of that is on a level with Chancellor Gordon Brown realising that being a Scot may be just the barrier he did not expect in his quest to be Prime Minister.

Wraps will only prosper if we support the process in its development and not stop it in its tracks.

Despite my moans, security people have a difficult job, as I once found out when they discovered an unexploded black pudding in my holdall. I was less exasperated than the police who arrived complete with their machine guns to deal with a suspected explosives smuggler and found a financial planner who likes Scottish fare.

Recommended

Sesame accused of dragging its feet on payouts

Claim-chaser Brunel Franklin has accused Sesame of dragging its feet over paying out compensation to customers. Brunel Franklin says it has over 150 cases outstanding against Sesame, with clients waiting up to 10 weeks to receive payment. It says it was told by the Sesame claims team that there is a six to eight-week delay […]

Jacobs threat to name firms for A-Day failures

Specialist pensions IFA Richards Jacobs has threatened to name and shame two leading product providers unless they radically improve their post-A-Day offerings. Jacobs, director of Richard Jacobs Pension & Trustee Services, says the providers, one of which is a top five insurer, are both failing to offer customers the full range of opportunities presented by […]

Worst of best

Best-buy tables are vital tools for brokers and are also useful for consumers. However, best-buy tables are not an even playing field. The trend to charging extortionately high arrangement fees means products at the top of the short-term residential best-buy tables work out to be far less attractive once this extra cost is factored in.

This week in Mortgages

Last week saw the spotlight fall on GE Money Home Lending over alleged undisclosed commission from past and present subsidiaries that is likely to result in compensation claims later this year from disgruntled mortgage customers.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com