View more on these topics

Ian McKenna: The rule threatening to undo the pensions dashboard

Ian McKennaNot allowing a dashboard provider to record any of the data obtained will prove a massive barrier to advice processes

The pensions dashboard project has been very much a stop-start affair. It has suffered massively because of Brexit; so much so, it is hard to see how the original delivery timescale of this year will not be missed. The Department for Work and Pensions recently published its response to a consultation, but what does it all mean for advisers and their clients?

The latest proposals are broadly constructive and a couple of key issues that might have undermined advisers using dashboards have been resolved positively, but many remain outstanding. Valuable wins include a clear commitment to multiple dashboards, as opposed to a single one, and the fact that delegated access (i.e. advisers being able to access information) is now confirmed.

Ian McKenna: AI – use it or lose to it

The commitment to compulsion, with pension providers not able to opt out, is another.

That said, the document still proposes allowing up to four years for some schemes to engage.

These schemes were asking for four years back in 2017. Have they done nothing to improve the quality of their data in the meantime?

The DWP points out such schemes already have a legal duty under the Data Protection Act and GDPR to make the initial data to be covered by dashboards available to individuals. If they are failing to do so, why has the Information Commissioner’s Office or The Pensions Regulator not already taken action?

Is the statement a warning of action to come? Advisers struggling to get the information they need from an obstructive pension scheme might want to prepare standard letters clients could use to lodge ICO complaints, quoting the DWP.

Inclusion of state pension benefits is also confirmed as a priority, but just when this key component will arrive is vague.

It is also recognised that much can be learned and reused from open banking, and that there are benefits of building a wider range of online services to give consumers a broader understanding of their financial lives. So far, so good.

Persistence of data
But there is one issue I fear may undo the whole project: a requirement that, at least for initial dashboards, there must be no persistence of data provided. Simply put, this means a dashboard provider cannot keep a record of any of the information obtained.

This could be a red herring that has not been fully thought through but it is cited as one of the main ways to satisfy certain data protection and security concerns raised by a number of parties.

If a dashboard provider cannot record any of the data obtained, this will be a massive barrier to using the information as part of any advice or guidance process.

What is more, it significantly undermines the case for building them in the first place.

That is not to say aggregation-type services will not be built, but rather a range of dashboard-like services may emerge, admittedly without state benefits, to compete.

Gregg McClymont: Six clear lessons for pensions dashboard success

There may be a simple answer. The DWP does acknowledge that data could be retained when needed for legal purposes.

If this were extended to cover legal and compliance purposes, the issue would be solved. However, the data security concerns of some parties might return.

This, along with the timescales, is the major concern then.

There is a real opportunity for dashboards to place the UK as a global leader in pension technology, but I fear this is about to be lost. Timescales must be more realistic.

The new Money and Pensions Service is between a rock and a hard place, having been handed a timeline any organisation would struggle to deliver on.

I cannot see how, realistically, we can be expected to get something live this year, whatever ministers might say.

I am disappointed not to see the acceptance of an interim dashboard that could still deliver key benefits.

Let’s be realistic and say we will get an initial interim solution out in the next 12 months and give the laggards 12 months after that. Allowing some to run on until 2023 should not be an option.

Ian McKenna is director of the Finance & Technology Research Centre

Recommended

2

Profile: ‘Someone booed me when I said I was a financial adviser’

Grosvenor Consultancy IFA Alice Douglass on the highs and lows of networking as a financial adviser Traffic wardens, tax inspectors, estate agents and journalists – all people doing jobs that the general public love to hate. But what is it about being a financial adviser that provokes such strong negative reactions from some people too? […]

Tapering of annual allowance – adjusted and threshold income

The definitions of adjusted income and threshold income used to determine whether, and to what extent, someone’s annual allowance will be reduced can be confusing.  Here we try to make sense of it all. The annual allowance will be reduced for high income individuals from 6 April 2016.  Our previous article Tapering of annual allowance […]

Careful-Research-Business-Finance-Paperwork-700.jpg

Global high yield outlook 2018

RLAM’s Head of Global High Yield, Azhar Hussain examines trends in the high yield and loans markets in a short video. Watch the video here Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them is not guaranteed and may go down as well as up and […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Peter Hopkins 3rd May 2019 at 3:37 pm

    Doesn’t the dashboard do what it’s intended to do, bring all the data into a session on the customer’s device and persist it for that session. Another service could use the data during that session if given permission by the customer and that could persist the data for that APP’s purpose. I thought this was what privacy by design looked like? A dashboard provider could build such an analysis mode but what they can not do is simply roll everything together.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com