Ian McKenna: Lighthouse is playing by new distribution rules


The news Lighthouse is launching its own investment funds and a preferred platform arrangement with Zurich is further evidence of the evolution of both the asset management and platform markets.

I understand the decision was driven by the vagaries of how fund managers change the risk profiles of funds over time. The move demonstrates that the technology the firm put in place to help clients in this area is now more important than any asset manager. Fund managers need to recognise there are new rules of the game; they must learn how to earn shelf space. Those who do not adapt are now entirely disposable and can be replaced swiftly.

Fund managers who cannot work with risk profiling criteria create additional work for advisers, resulting in more costs for clients. But the need to monitor manager adherence to the tolerances of risk profiling tools is an avoidable expense, as is the frictional cost of the resulting fund switches necessary to stay in line with the agreed client objectives.

By establishing its own funds Lighthouse can clearly set the objectives for the managers to stay aligned with the risk profiles it has agreed with the client. The firm uses Distribution Technology’s risk profiling tools at the heart of its advice process. It has worked with Octopus Investments to build the Luceo funds with the objective of staying within Distribution Technology’s risk profiles four, five and six.

These are all actively managed multi-asset fund of funds. The process is managed by Octopus, which is accountable to Luceo’s investment committee. Lighthouse has the option to replace Octopus if performance or other objectives are not met.

Launching three funds initially, the intention is to widen the range both with actives and passives. Charges are currently described as “middle of road” for active managed funds, targeting 1.35 per cent including all costs.

Having put in place funds that can be kept closely aligned with the agreed client requirements, Lighthouse needed a platform to distribute them through. And while not looking to build its own from scratch again it wanted more control. As such, it has entered a preferred platform arrangement with Zurich. The initial deal is for five years, at the end of which Lighthouse could plug in an alternative platform or renew the arrangement.

Lighthouse customers receive a 6.5 basis points discount on the annual platform fee, as well as additional life cover in the first year. Zurich has also upgraded its integration with Intelliflo’s Wealthlink capability – Lighthouse’s chosen client management system supplier – to enhance the level of straight through processing that can be achieved, further reducing costs. Negotiations are ongoing to make the Luceo funds available via a small number of other platforms.

In creating these new options for its advisers Lighthouse has maintained the rigour of its existing research solution but provided more flexibility. Advisers can still opt for other solutions or indeed go outside their normal approved product list, but additional controls have to be addressed if they do.

Overall, this is a positive deal for Lighthouse and its clients, and both Octopus and Zurich have an opportunity to build the sort of next generation strategic relationship that will be valuable to their businesses long term.

Platforms or asset managers that think they can preserve historic margins are failing to understand the combined impact of RDR and technology on the advice market. In my experience, very few platforms and even fewer asset managers fully understand how to adapt their operations to reflect the impact of this combination.

Advice businesses have historically handed over far too much margin and embedded value to institutions. Post-RDR they are well placed to negotiate better pricing and services and more equitable distribution of the value chain. Any advice firm not looking to make such changes is missing significant opportunities.

Expect to see several more similar deals in the near future as adviser firms enhance their services to customers, grow their value propositions and reduce their regulatory risk.

Ian McKenna is director of the Finance & Technology Research Centre



Aviva offloads stake in Lighthouse

Aviva has sold its entire stake in Lighthouse Group, London Stock Exchange filings show. Aviva held an 8 per cent share in the AIM-listed advice firm. The original stake was held by Friends Provident, later Friends Life, which was acquired by Aviva in April 2015. An Aviva spokesman says: “Part of the stake was originally […]


Lighthouse profits soar despite £500k trail hit

Lighthouse Group pre-tax interim profits have soared 131 per cent from £470,000 to £829,000 despite a loss of £500,000 in revenues due to the switch-off of trail commission. The group’s revenues fell to £23.78m from £23.94m at the end of June 2015. The results say: “Whilst revenues reduced marginally in comparison with the same period […]


Lighthouse launches in-house investment arm

Lighthouse Group has launched an in-house investment proposition powered by Octopus Investments and the Zurich platform. Luceo Asset Management has launched with three risk-targeted multi-manager funds run by Octopus and available through the newly set-up Lighthouse Zurich platform. The deal between Lighthouse and Zurich has been agreed for a five-year term. Fund performance will be […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Unless I’m missing something special about the Lighthouse offering it’s far from new in fact I’d say its old hat. Most networks have been doing this for some time with in-house funds if they are provider owned or external where they are not. Even SimplyBiz offers this to their members via Verbatim with portfolios matched to DT risk profiles.

  2. I think you are missing a couple of things Darren Cooke. This arrangement avoids the need for fund switching and it includes a rebate of the platform fee to the client, neither of which are available from the type of arrangement you describe in your comment. It is a significant move by Lighthouse and one which asset managers and platforms should be careful not to ignore.

  3. David, not quite right as there is a platform cost on top of the 1.35% quoted and the adviser charge. The article hints at Lighthouses’ strong promotion of the Zurich platform, almost insistence its used, which brings a discount offered by Zurich, for the first 12 months initially, bringing the platform cost down to 0.285%. So the total cost is actually 1.35 + 0.285 = 1.635 plus adviser costs. So its not particularly cost effective for an “in house” fund. There are certainly many networks that do something similar at a much lower cost and maintain the same oversight on risk.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com