View more on these topics

How will Govt close new pensions recycling loophole?

The Government could be forced to cut the annual allowance to £10,000 for people who buy an annuity in order to close a potential tax loophole.

Yesterday, HMRC published draft tax rules to accompany Chancellor George Osborne’s radical Budget reforms.

As well as allowing people to access their entire pot without tax penalties from age 55, policymakers want to loosen rules around annuities to encourage providers to develop more flexible retirement income products.

But while HMRC has confirmed the annual allowance will be reduced from £40,000 to £10,000 for people who decide to access their pension pot from age 55, this is not the case for those who buy an annuity.

Experts told Money Marketing the decision not to impose the annual allowance cut for people who annuitise under the new regime means that, in theory, savers could take the majority of their fund in cash in year one – including the tax-free lump sum – without seeing their yearly tax-free savings limit lowered.

AJ Bell technical resources manager Gareth James says HMRC has three options from its current position:

1. Proceed with the rules as proposed in the draft legislation but monitor annuity product development and marketing to see if there is any abuse.  This would mean everyone with an annuity keeps an annual allowance of £40,000 at least for now;

2. Draw a distinction between those who buy a traditional annuity and those who buy a flexible annuity. Those with a traditional annuity would keep an annual allowance of £40,000 and those who can make use of the new options have an annual allowance of £10,000;

3. Move to a position where everyone with an annuity has an annual allowance of £10,000. “On the basis that the Government’s own figures indicate that only a very limited number of people would use more than a £10,000 annual allowance this may be the simpler option,” James says.

James adds: “It seems strange that the Government has focused so much attention on the potential for tax abuse through flexi-access drawdown but at the same time has left the door open with lifetime annuities. 

“Given the limited number of annuitants likely to contribute more than £10,000 there is an argument for reducing their money purchase annual allowance to that level.”

MGM Advantage pensions technical director Andy Tully says: “Government are aware of it and if people abuse it Government will close the loophole. 

“There aren’t hundreds of companies available in providing annuities and hopefully they all realise it would only be a short win, if a win at all. The £10,000 annual allowance was a reasonable solution for the industry and we run the risk of the Government taking stricter measures if the industry pushes things too far.”

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Claire Trott - Talbot & Muir 7th August 2014 at 3:56 pm

    It seems to me that there will not be a great deal of appetite from annuity providers to pay out the majority of someone’s funds in year one, when they have to commit to provide an annuity for life. However small the annual payments something still needs to be paid each year.

    The administrative cost and burden of this will surely put most companies off this route as where can they make a profit.

  2. It does seem sad that the biggest story to come out of the draft tax rules seems to be the industry crowing at an apparent loophole left by HMRC.

    It can’t be any more than crowing, because if anyone genuinely thought it was a loophole that could actually be exploited, surely they wouldn’t have made such a song and dance about it.

    Andrew Tully is right – If it’s abused, the government will close it. Did anyone seriously think otherwise?

  3. I’m in the process of advising a client to redirect her State Pension (of which she has no need whatsoever) into her Personal Pension (of which she has no need either). That won’t count as recycling, will it?

    The Trust governing her PP will, under present rules, become void upon her reaching the age of 75, though with luck the government may relax that and allow Trusts governing unvested funds to continue indefinitely.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com