View more on these topics

How to make the facts clear

Danny Lovey, principal of mortgage broker The Mortgage Practitioner, sets out an example of how he believes the FSA should change the mortgage key facts document to ensure borrowers can easily understand the information

The FSA’s principle 7 – communications with clients – states: “A firm must pay due regard to the information needs of its clients and communicate information to them in a way which is clear, fair and not misleading.

Yes, I agree, but the problem is that the FSA never listened to the market when it was preparing the mortgage key facts document.

Considering that research has shown that the average consumer has the reading ability of a 12-and-a-half-year-old, it is not consumer- friendly.

We all know that the FSA is charged with being the consumers’ protector but, in my view, the FSA fails to understand the average consumers ability to absorb the mortgage key facts document.

Back in 2005, I argued that the KFI needed a clear front page with a summary with the important statistics and information that the consumer would actually understand.

If you pick up a KFI currently, you have no idea who the lender is, what the product is, the term of the mortgage, what you are paying a month, or what the fees are.

Instead, you have to pick your way through the document, with most clients losing patience because it is so long-winded and takes several readings to understand.

Some KFI documents can even be considered misleading. Item five, for example – the overall cost of the mortgage – assumes that you will stay on that same lender’s SVR for the remaining term of the mortgage, which could be up to 23 years for a two-year fixed-rate deal. This is extremely unlikely in itself, and, of course, SVRs can move about as much as interest rates. Currently, the average SVR is nearer 3.5 per cent over base compared with 2 per cent a year ago.

Everybody knows they will pay a lot of interest over, say, 25 years but the current way of showing this is meaningless and misleading.
The one that also often gets a comment is item eight – what fees must you pay.

“What is all this about?”, “why is it different on each lender’s KFI?” and “I will be paying a lot more than that” are some of the more common client reactions.

I then have to explain another meaningless and misleading figure, saying that this is supposed to indicate the amount you pay for the privilege of using the same solicitor as the lender as he is representing you both, but you Mr Client have the privilege of paying it. Guaranteed to put the client’s head in a spin.

But despite this, the KFI merited very little mention in the FSA’s mortgage market review published last week.

The FSA seems to concede that consumers are not using the disclosure information in the way intended, to compare products. The review says: “Disclosure was intended to enable consumers to shop around and compare the services and products on offer from different firms, and to help them make better informed choices. However, the evidence suggests that few consumers are using the prescribed documentation in the way we intended.”

But despite this, the FSA says it has no plans to change the current KFI: “We believe that we should retain the KFI given the significant set-up costs and the consistent message from research that the KFI is liked and used by consumers (although only a small number of more savvy consumers use it to shop around).”

I am a simple soul who deals with the consumer at the coalface, so what would I know compared with those in the Ivory Tower?

The fact that I know that it would make the KFI clearer, fairer and unlikely to be as misleading is anecdotal rather than intellectual.

Nevertheless, I have redrafted what I think a front page of a KFI should look like to make it readily understandable to the average consumer in the hope that someone at the FSA may just think I have a point.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I am a Conveyancer and a mortgage adviser (unusual mix I know). I wholeheartedly agree with your comments. It’s clear to everyone involved in the house buying process (except of course to the FSA) that consumers haven’t a clue and can’t be bothered to ask questions. Good advisers do that for them – but good advisers are few and far between. I suggest that a new law be passed…”From today all adults will be held responsible for their decisions they make. It’s against the law to blame anyone else for their poor decision making. The buyer should to carry out due diligence checks on anything they buy – be it a house, a financial product, a washing machine or whatever. Caveat emptor applies Mr Buyer and the buck stops with you!

  2. I did the same with the Client Agreement and terms of Business which isn’t even IN a prescribed format and got threatened with a visit from the “boys” if i tried to point out that clients do have some responsibility to take advice and act on it AFTER they have arranegd a product, i.e. I suggested they must bring a complaint within 15 years of ceasing to be a client (not 15 years of the sale of a product, but 15 years from the provision or reconfirmation of advice). Linda Woodall (FSA) REFUSED to talk to me on the phone to discuss what I was trying to achieve (which could have meant she could have suggested some changes to make the document acceptable to HER rather than the law) and refused to even read the document before she started putting threats in writing and said the matter was “closed” . So I would not hold out too much hope of the dictators at Canary Wharf listening.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com