View more on these topics

Hornbuckle: RDR has seen Sipp orphans double

Hornbuckle Mitchell says the number of Sipp holders that have become orphan clients has more than doubled in the last 18 months as a result of the RDR.

Speaking at the Money Marketing Retirement Planning Summit in Monte Carlo last week, managing director David White said the firm has seen the number of Sipp clients without an IFA rise from 700 to 1,800.

White said IFAs are dropping clients that are no longer economical to service as they segment their client banks.

He said: “We have seen the number of clients without an IFA more than double in the last 18 months as IFAs go through the segmentation process.”

He added some clients are choosing to leave their IFAs following the move to a feebased proposition and warned that he expects the situation to get worse as the RDR deadline gets closer.

Affluent Financial Planning managing director Carl Melvin says: “I think what Hornbuckle Mitchell is saying is right. IFAs are having to look at the commercial reality of servicing clients. It is an expensive business and when you add the cost of increasing regulation on top, it becomes even harder.”

Melvin says the move to fees, combined with increasing regulatory costs, are forcing many IFAs to adopt smaller but more lucrative client banks.

He says: “The new model for IFAs is about fewer clients, better relationships and more revenue. I think the increase in orphaned clients is entirely predictable and we will see more of it as we get closer to the RDR deadline.”


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. SIMON MANSELL 2nd June 2011 at 1:08 pm

    Mark Hoban MP please note: IFAs are dropping clients that are no longer economical to service as they segment their client banks.

    Tell me Mr Hoban how much longer you can act as the three (not so) wise monkeys of the Treasury repeating your mantra that RDR is for the benefit of the consumer.

  2. 2nd June 2011 at 2:39 pm

    Can someone explain to me why a client shouldn’t be allowed to pay via commision as opposed to upfront fees?

    Funny thing is that if those who bought into the idea that they needed an all singing all dancing SIPP won’t pay for ongoing advice, then the average person on the street won’t pay either for a normal PP.

    It’s a shame that the failed advisers who went to work in the FSA , and their Labour friends, were allowed to get us into this mess in the first place!

  3. sure it’s not something to do with their admin and service

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm