View more on these topics

HMRC ramps up tax bills over film partnerships

HMRC-Building-700x450.jpg

A total of 780 rich and famous investors who paid £2.2bn into film investment schemes are facing huge tax bills of up to 20 times the amount they invested.

The Times reports investors include former Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson, former England managers Sven Goran-Eriksson and Glen Hoddle, and former Sainsbury’s chairman Sir Peter Davis.

HM Revenue & Customs has told tax advisers it plans to issue payment demands that outstrips the initial money invested. For example, an investor placing £200,000 in one scheme is expected to face a tax bill of between £2m and £4m.

In April the Supreme Court ruled Eclipse 35, one of the biggest film partnerships, was a tax avoidance scheme. The judgment has been used to pursue demands for investors in 38 similar film partnerships.

Demands will be sent out in the next two months and investors will have 90 days to pay. Eclipse is expected to seek a judicial review of HMRC’s decision to issue payment demands in this way.

Though the Eclipse schemes, investors would pay into the scheme and also take out a loan. The scheme buys the rights to films, then relicenses rights back to the studio.

Investors would then “pre-pay” 10 years’ worth of interest on the loan, generating a loss which can offset for tax purposes on other income.

One investor told the newspaper: “I am paying back four times the capital I invested. And I still have to pay tax on the income in future years. A fellow investor in my scheme, this is going to bankrupt him.

“I started to mitigate. This individual didn’t. How many suicides do HMRC need to go through?”

Law firm Herbert Smith Freehills partner Stephen Gale, a member of two Eclipse schemes, took his life in 2014.

HMRC will be taxing future earnings from the scheme despite these payments going directly to loan repayments.

A spokesman says: “The majority of schemes simply don’t work.”

Recommended

HMRC loses Supreme Court appeal on film partnership press briefing

Film partnership firm Ingenious has won a Supreme Court appeal against HM Revenue and Customs which ruled HMRC unlawfully disclosed confidential information in an “off the record” press briefing. The briefing took place in June 2012 and was between then-permanent secretary of HMRC David Hartnett and two journalists. Ingenious says HMRC justified the briefing because it wanted […]

RBS-Building-500x320.jpg

Coutts sued over film partnerships advice

Coutts, the private banking and wealth management arm of Royal Bank of Scotland, could be on the hook for hundreds of thousands of pounds in redress following client claims they were given bad advice to invest in film schemes. According to the Times, 220 clients have filed a lawsuit against Coutts, UBS and other advisers […]

Cinema-Reel-Movie-Film-Projector-700.jpg

Ingenious hits back at ‘false’ HMRC claims in film partnership case

Film partnership firm Ingenious has hit back at HMRC for “deliberately confusing” the scheme with proven tax avoidance schemes. Ingenious chief executive Neil Forster has accused HMRC of making assertions that are “factually wrong” and for incorrectly linking it to tax avoidance scheme Icebreaker. The comments come after both HM Revenue and Customs and Ingenious film partnerships […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment