View more on these topics

HMRC investigates pensions intellectual property valuations

HMRC has launched an investigation into the valuations of intellectual property used to release cash from pension schemes, Money Marketing understands.

Intellectual property such as patent, trademarks, designs and copyright can be used as loans to sponsoring employers or in sale and leaseback arrangements to release cash from schemes.

The value of loans and leasebacks is determined by a valuation undertaken by a third party, typically a specialist intellectual property law firm.

But a letter from one provider to a pension client, seen by Money Marketing, says HMRC and its shares and asset valuations department is conducting a general review of valuations since May 2011.

It says the tax office is preparing a legal challenge against valuations it believes have been overstated, resulting in an incorrect amount of tax being paid.

Dentons director of technical services Martin Tilley says his firm has three or four clients using intellectual property as an asset within schemes.

He says: “We only consider intellectual property if it’s of a significant value and if a valuation specialist has been used. If you’re going to value IP properly you need to be an expert in IP and in the particular field it relates to.

“Just having a jack of all trades accountant doesn’t stack up as an in-depth professional valuation and that’s what’s come into question.

“It is a worry and we were aware HMRC was cracking down on this.”

Tilley warns if HMRC finds the valuation was inflated, the difference between the true valuation will be treated as an unauthorised payment and tax charges will apply to the recipient and the scheme.

He says: “The two charges combined usually come to a minimum of 55 per cent of the difference. If that amounts to more than 25 per cent of the value of the fund there could be a further sanction charge.”

Clifton Asset Management also accept intellectual property.

A spokesman confirms the provider “has been in dialogue with HMRC over just 13 cases since December 2012, and we have been in regular correspondence since”.

He adds: “No Clifton schemes involving intellectual property valuations have been challenged by HMRC that has resulted in an unauthorised payment charge being paid.”

HMRC declined to comment.

Recommended

Parliament-London-UK-Night-700x450.jpg
6

MPs: HMRC ‘fighting an uphill battle’ on tax cheats

An investigation into improving tax collection by Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee has reported that HMRC is failing to clamp down on both evasion and aggressive tax avoidance. Committee chair Margaret Hodge says the “complexity of tax law and constraints on HMRC’s resources” mean the Revenue is “fighting an uphill battle against those who are determined […]

HMRC amends pension reclaim form

HMRC is to change the wording of one of its new tax forms for people reclaiming overpaid tax on pension withdrawals, after confusion over who could use it. Form 55 is to be updated because it currently implies it should only be used if “you’ve only taken one payment and do not intend to take […]

HMRC takes bank bonus appeal to Supreme Court

The UK’s highest court is to hear an appeal by HMRC over two offshore schemes used by banks to shield staff payments from tax. The tax office will attempt to convince the Supreme Court that UBS and Deutsche Bank used the schemes to avoid tax in 2003 and 2004, the FT reports. Employees received shares […]

Tax-Taxation-Blocks-700.jpg
4

HMRC unveils new forms to reclaim tax on pensions

HMRC has unveiled three new forms to allow people to claim back overpaid tax after accessing their pension under the new freedoms. In a newsletter published today, the Government confirms individuals will be able to use the P50Z, P53Z and P55 forms to reclaim tax if they were placed on emergency tax codes when taking […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Not clear why use of this type of asset is allowed.

    The scope for abuse is obvious. However, as the use of this type of asset was known to HMRC, some leniancy on payments taken before this announcement would not be unreasonable.

  2. The true cost of ‘simplification’ is now coming home to roost.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com