View more on these topics

Held to task over broken promises of life companies

After some 30 years in the insurance industry, I have now put away my pen and have ceased advising clients on their insurance problems and needs.

Despite this, it is apparent that I can still be held to task and need to provide substantial reasons for what, say, 15 years ago, would have been deemed sound advice.

Over half of my professional life I have sought to establish goodwill in a business sector that has used such terms as “unitised with-profits”, which we were persuaded consolidated all gains made so that they could not be reduced once added – and yet they still went down.

We have had to stand by and see CEOs of what we believed were solid and reliable financial institutions depleting, at a cost to our reputations, the savings of our clients while a few of them paid themselves bonuses in one year that some of our clients (and their customers) could not have earned in a lifetime.

Because we were assured by those fine gentlemen who represent the pillars of our financial institutions that by incorporating a mix of gilts, bonds, deposits and equities in their products, our clients&#39 savings would both be secure and would grow, we recommended them accordingly. How is it they still went down? And even more so, how is it that we should be accountable?

Essentially, brokers and IFAs were able to choose from a range of “reputable” companies that offered us a selection of benefits we felt were suitable for the circumstances of our clients. We, in good faith, made recommendations to buy products which, when confronted with a turndown in the economy, proved the promises of these esteemed institutions false. They have, like sheep, fallen into the same black hole.

Brokers and IFAs are being called to account for assuming that the life insurance industry held the maxim of utmost good faith sacrosanct but apparently they now wish to dump their responsibilities exclusively on to us. How many financial journalists, for example, even including those with IFA qualifications, would have questioned the projections of such offices as Equitable, Britannic, Standard Life or Norwich Union? (One such journalist put his own pension fund into Equitable.)

Now I have a personal quandary. Faced with a vacillating stockmarket, annuity rates that look so sick that one wonders if they will ever recover and an industry that cannot quote what I ask for because its staff appear totally untrained, I am desperately trying to find some of that good faith that I have endeavoured to encourage my clients to believe in over the years. Who shall I hold to account for following my own advice that was based on the promises of these financial giants with what now seem to be feet of clay?

Don Pashley

Principal,

Spencer Pashley Partnership,

Portsmouth,

Hampshire

Recommended

Burden retires from C&G after 34 years

Cheltenham & Gloucester managing director Roger Burden is to retire at the end of April after 34 years at the company.He will be replaced by Jon Pain, who is currently MD at LloydsTSB&#39s general insurance arm. Burden, who was appointed MD in 1997, grew C&G&#39s assets to £58bn at the end of last year from […]

Can I have a word? Get it sorted…

Abbey National may have the smooth, suave housewives&#39 favourite Martin Kemp as the corporate image to get it out of its current hole, but if IFA portal Webline wants to continue the ex-Eastenders theme they need not look too far afield.While simmering hard man Grant Mitchell, aka Ross Kemp, himself might be a touch expensive, […]

Investors taking a hands-off approach to shares

More than three-quarters of shareholders plan to leave their shares untouched over the next three months, indicating that investors may believe the market has bottomed out, according to research from stockbroker comdirect.The company&#39s quarterly cash confidence survey, which investigates the public&#39s attitude to investing, shows that 77 per cent of people with shares intend to […]

Old Mutual Asset Managers – UK Large Cap Fund

Tuesday, 4 March 2003 Type: Hedge fund Aim: Growth by investing in large cap UK companies Minimum investment: Lump sum £100,000, euros 100,000, $100,000 Place of registration: Cayman Islands Investment split: 100% in large cap UK companies Charges: Annual 1.5% Commission: None Tel: 0808 1002715

UK housebuilders remain a value trap – despite post-Brexit falls

Despite the sharp drop in housebuilders following the Brexit result, valuations in the highly illiquid market are still at elevated levels. And whilst some investors may take comfort from superficially low price/earnings multiples, are earnings sustainable over the long term, asks Holly Cassell, Assistant Manager of the Neptune UK Mid Cap Fund. Click here to […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com