View more on these topics

Head to head: Should higher rate relief be cut?

TUC head of campaigns Nigel Stanley and Chatfield Private Client director Adrian Pickersgill go head to head: Should higher-rate tax relief on pension contributions be scrapped?

adrian pickersgill
Adrian Pickersgill, Director, Chatfield Private Client

So, here we are again with rumours of the possible removal of higher-rate tax relief on pension contributions and the loss of the 25 per cent tax-free cash lump sum on retirement. These are almost annual rumours in the run-up to the Budget.

What is different this time is that Treasury chief secretary Danny Alexander has reiterated the Liberal Democrats’ commitment to restrict pension tax relief for higher-rate taxpayers.

Higher-rate taxpayers cost the Government an estimated £7bn a year in pension tax relief, so might there be some substance to these rumours, especially with the Government’s finances in such a perilous state?

All the discussions about tax relief on pension contributions forget to mention that when pensions come into payment, they are taxed as income, so, in reality, pensions are only deferring the Government’s tax take.

Now, to give another incentive for us to save now and spend later, we are currently allowed to take 25 per cent of the pension fund as a tax-free lump sum. For many ’If the Govern-ment removes higher-rate tax relief and the tax-free lump sum, I predict a massive reduc-tion in saving’people, this gives them a lump of cash that can be used to pay off any loans or mortgages still remaining and basically get themselves financially sorted at the end of their working lives.

“If the Government removes higher-rate tax relief and the tax-free lump sum, I predict a massive reduction in saving”

Confidence in pension saving has been badly damaged over the years by a combination of constant rules changes and unnecessary complexity, by all recent governments, overcharging by pension companies, poor investment returns from global equity markets for that last 12 years and the dramatic crash in gilt yields, which has had the effect of reducing the final pension/annuity that people receive. For those few people left saving into pensions, it looks like the Treasury wants to stop them from doing so as well.

If the Government does remove higher-rate tax relief and the tax-free cash lump sum, I predict a massive reduction in future pension savings. This, of course, fits perfectly with the Government’s desire for people to spend and not save in order to help kickstart the economy. Another short-term policy which is against the country’s long-term benefit.

The irony is, of course, that Nest is about to be launched and all employers will be forced to join their employees into the scheme (or equivalent). Employees then have to opt out of the pension within the first month, otherwise any money contributed will be locked into the pension.

The Government needs to realise that the whole pension system is broken and needs to be reviewed in light of the modern world and flexible working practices. However, the last time a politician was given the task of thinking the unthinkable with pensions, Frank Field, he was given the sack for his conclusions.

nigel stanley
Nigel Stanley, Head of campaigns, The TUC

There are rumours that the Government is considering reducing pension tax relief in this month’s Budget. Is the Government right to consider reducing the amount it spends on higher-rate tax relief?

The state provides tax relief to encourage good behaviour or to make the tax system fairer.

Tax relief is a cost – tax foregone has to be made up by other taxpayers. My tax relief is your tax burden.

So, how do we evaluate pension tax relief? It is good public policy to encourage people to save for retirement. If people do not, they become a burden on the state as they will claim mean-tested benefits – not just the pensioner-related means-tested benefits but housing and council tax benefits among others. Pensions lock your savings away, so there is a case for compensating people for this restriction.

’Tax relief is a cost – tax foregone has to be made up by other tax-payers. My tax relief is your tax burden’

In an increasingly DC world, with longevity growing, there is therefore a strong argument for encouraging pension saving through tax relief. But that does not mean that it should be open ended.

“Tax relief is a cost – tax foregone has to be made up by other taxpayers. My tax relief is your tax burden”

Once people are saving enough to lift them clear of means-tested benefits and provide a reasonable post-retirement income, should other taxpayers still bear the cost of further relief?

Here we need to ask the fairness question. Pension tax relief is at the marginal rate. As a higher-rate taxpayer, it costs me 60p to put a pound in my pension pot. But it costs my lower-paid colleagues 80p as they are pay a 20p marginal tax rate. What unites us is looking jealously on those on the 50p tax rate who can save a pension pound for just 50p.

Two-thirds of tax relief goes to higher-rate taxpayers, yet only one in seven taxpayers pay either higher or additional-rate tax. Of course, pensions in payment are taxed – if not the lump sum. But the vast majority of those who get higher-rate tax relief before retirement pay at the standard rate when they retire.

Pension tax relief is therefore about the least progressive element in our tax system. The cap introduced by the last government was absolutely right. With spending cuts and the VAT increase hurting the poor more than the better off, any government looking to raise revenue should look hard at further change such as further restrictions in the annual limit that can be claimed.

But it should not all disappear into deficit reduction. A good chunk should stay in pensions either by helping ease the intro-duction of the £140 flat rate or by skewing the benefit down the income scale.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Julian Stevens 5th March 2012 at 8:40 pm

    Both commentators fail to mention two fundamental things:-

    1. Higher rate taxpayers and their employers pay the most in terms of income tax and NIC. Why should individuals not therefore be granted tax relief at their highest marginal rate on what they contribute to an approved pension plan?

    2. What happened to the Conservatives’ pre-election manifesto pledge to put right all the damage done to pensions by successive governments over the past 25 years and to “reignite the UK’s savings culture”? Was that undertaking just another vote-grabbing lie?

    Apart from that, taxing the PCLS really will kill off once and for all what little confidence remains in saving for retirement by way of a pension plan.

  2. Nigel Stanley’s assertion that “my tax relief is your tax burden” is simply wrong. My tax relief is simply me getting to keep more of the money I have earned. So, must other taxpayers pay more tax themselves to make up the resulting shortfall in the Treasury’s coffer, due to my selfish decision to make provision for my old age? No. The government can simply spend less.

    It cannot be stressed strongly enough that pensions tax relief isn’t a case of the government “giving you something”, as though it is somehow being wonderfully generous. You are just paying no tax on the income you set aside for your retirement, on the understanding that you will eventually pay tax on it (when it is much larger, hopefully) when you retire. This principle has seemed perfectly reasonable and fair for generations, so why change it now.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com