View more on these topics

HBOS report slams FSA over ‘flawed’ investigation

Hector-Sants-smiles-at-the-podium-in-2011 700.jpg

The long-awaited report into the failure of HBOS has criticised the FSA for its “flawed” investigation into the bank.

The report concludes that ultimate responsibility for the failure of HBOS rests with the board and senior management. It says the FSA failed to give proper consideration to investigating other senior individuals and the bank itself.

Only one former HBOS director, Peter Cummings, was fined in the aftermath of HBOS’ failure.

The FCA was criticised this week after admitting it will be unable to fine any former HBOS executives because the bank’s failure will fall outside the six-year statute of limitation on fines.

The regulator remains able to ban ex-HBOS directors from the financial services sector. However, former HBOS chief executives Andy Hornby and James Crosby and former chairman Lord Stevenson no longer hold an active registration as an approved person.

In the report, Andrew Green QC recommends that the PRA and FCA should now consider whether any former senior managers of HBOS should be the subject of an enforcement investigation with a view to enforcing bans.

Green says the FCA’s enforcement investigations into the failure of HBOS were “not reasonable”, and its decision-making process “materially flawed”.

He says the only person whose possible misconduct was given proper consideration for investigation was Cummings. He says the FSA gave no proper consideration to the investigation of any other individuals including former members of the board, or to an investigation of HBOS itself.

In an interview for the report, one senior former FSA employee said “the people most culpable were let off”. In his view these were Hornby and Lord Stevenson.

The report found HBOS’ senior management and board failed to set an appropriate business strategy and failed to challenge a flawed business model which placed inappropriate reliance on continuous growth without due regard to the risks involved.

It also says flaws in the FSA’s supervisory approach meant it did not appreciate the full extent of the risks HBOS was running and was not in a position to intervene before it was too late.

In his report interview, former FSA chief executive Hector Sants said the regulator’s resources were “stretched almost to breaking point” during the period of HBOS’ failure and the financial crisis.

The report argues the regulatory regime was “ill-suited” to taking enforcement action against individuals where a bank had failed. This is because of the difficulties of proving personal culpability in such a large organisation.

The regulator’s investigation into the HBOS collapse was first launched in 2012, and was delayed with the introduction of the FCA and the Prudential Regulation Authority in 2013.

In a scathing report published in April 2013, the parliamentary commission on banking standards called for Lord Stevenson, Hornby and Crosby to be banned from financial services.

Recommended

18

The dawn of ‘fear-based’ insistent client advice charges

Advisers are adopting what has been dubbed a “fear-based” advice charging model as the thorny issue of insistent clients rumbles on. The FCA published a factsheet on dealing with clients who want to act against a recommendation in the summer. But despite regulatory assurances that firms can deal with insistent clients if they follow normal suitability processes, […]

HMRC-Building-700x450.jpg
5

‘No evidence’ HMRC rules are cleaning up SSAS market

SSAS savers are still at risk of tax charges a year on from the introduction of fit and proper rules designed to protect against scams, providers warn. Since 1 September 2014, HM Revenue & Customs has been able to refuse both to register a new  pension scheme and to de-register an existing scheme if the scheme’s administrator […]

Seven Families one year on: What has the campaign achieved for protection?

The Seven Families campaign has been a “springboard” to improving consumer awareness of protection, say industry experts. One year on from the campaign’s launch, commentators say the initiative’s greatest successes have been improving adviser engagement and bringing industry funding together. But others say the project has failed to ignite consumers’ interest in the way many […]

Tenet business development boss to join SimplyBiz

SimplyBiz has hired Tenet head of business development Tom Hegarty as managing director of its New Model Business Academy. Hegarty joins the training and development division after four years at Tenet. He previously held roles at MetLife and Friends Provident. The not-for-profit NMBA has over 16,000 members and provides support to advisers developing skills in […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. So the new regulator FCA is blaming the old regulator FSA of not doing the job correctly.

    Surely they are one and the same regulator and therefore the FCA cannot be without blame.

    Do most of the people within the FSA now work for the FCA, so they all failed to regulate the Banks.

    The FCA cannot distance itself from this, if they do they are deluded!

  2. Ah, Hector Sants, Mervyn King and James Crosby. Here you go lads – well done on your efforts, have a knighthood.

  3. It was a rebrand and a minor reorganisation. They are the same by any sane standard.

    They say “the regulatory regime was “ill-suited” to taking enforcement action against individuals where a bank had failed. This is because of the difficulties of proving personal culpability in such a large organisation.”

    Bunk? How did Iceland manage it 26 times over – and those are just the bankers sent to jail?

  4. One senior former FSA employee said “the people most culpable were let off”. In his view these were Hornby and Lord Stevenson.

    They were let off.

    That points to what has been at the heart of everything at the top of financial services AND its regulation over the last few years. Some people just get let off and others don’t, depending on who has the power, the money and the influence.

    Riffraff in suits.

  5. FSA company number Company No. 01920623
    Status: Active
    Date of Incorporation: 07/06/1985
    Country of Origin: United Kingdom
    Previous Names:
    Date of change Previous Name
    02/04/2013 THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY
    28/10/1997 THE SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS BOARD
    20/08/1987 SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS BOARD LIMITED(THE)

Leave a comment