View more on these topics

Gregg McClymont: What does good look like post pension freedoms?


The New Year is always a time for predictions. So here goes. If automatic enrolment was 2014’s theme and 2015 dominated by the first cohorts with access to pensions freedom and choice, this year is set to be the year in which defining value for money and determining “good outcomes” enters stage right.

Trustees and independent governance committees are manfully working to develop models with respect to the former. This is hard enough. Harder still is defining good outcomes in a UK retirement system encompassing millions of individuals and families with vastly divergent resources and investable assets.

One size will not fit all. The range of appropriate outcomes for high-net-worth individuals with significant non-pension assets is likely to be much wider (given a greater capacity to absorb risk) than for savers depending on a modest defined contribution pot to supplement their basic state pension entitlement.

Defining good outcomes used to be easier when drawdown was only available to high-net-worth retirees. This policy compressed the range of outcomes and risks in the mass market. An income was guaranteed for life, even if it was sub-optimal, for most people.

Now the risk landscape has utterly changed, with the end of compulsory annuitising and access from age 55. A good outcome to a 55 or 60-year-old could mean having enough money to pay off their mortgage or debts, or fund their children through university. However, as that person ages, their idea of a good outcome may change and they may regret having spent their savings in early retirement.

Whether retirees choose to buy an annuity, go into drawdown or do something else entirely, they will consider this part of their pension savings journey.

No wonder attention is turning to (re)defining good outcomes. To date, the Turner Pension Commission’s emphasis on replacement rates has held the field.

These rates start high for low earners and taper to a target replacement rate of 50 per cent for those earning over £51,098. As a rule of thumb, Turner suggested two-thirds of final salary as a target retirement income for life.

Some now see this as too ambitious, too generous or just too plain blunt a metric. The influential Institute for Fiscal Studies emphasises the necessity of taking full account of the financial differences between working and retirement.

Retirees do not face many of the same costs as working people: for example, they do not pay National Insurance, do not have to provide for children or, of course, save for a pension. Financial geography must also be taken into account since living costs vary widely between regions and cities.

Doubtless the IFS is right. But a more fundamental question begins to take shape. If the exercise of individual freedom and choice in itself is the object of government policy, how far can the industry hope to develop good outcomes rules of thumb at all?

Gregg McClymont is head of retirement savings at Aberdeen Asset Management



Pension Wise demand slumps as appointment costs rise

The number of Pension Wise appointments has been steadily falling since October while the cost per session has been rising, Treasury figures reveal. Government statistics published today show there were 3,205 appointments in December, down from a high of 6,755 in October. When the service launched, telephone sessions – run by The Pensions Advisory Service […]


Kim North: Who can save us from pensions complexity?

I cannot remember a time when there have been so many changes to the pension landscape. We have complained for years  legislation should be simplified in order to help people understand it, yet levels of complexity are still being added. New jargon introduced by the pension freedoms, such as UFPLS, now sits on hundreds of […]


Nic Cicutti: Pensions shouldn’t be used to climb the greasy pole

Has Labour gone AWOL from the financial services beat? That was the question asked by Money Marketing last week, following a reshuffle by the party that has seen four shadow pensions ministers appointed in less than a year. The latest through Labour’s revolving door on pensions, unknown MP Angela Rayner, replaces the equally anonymous Nick […]

uk equities

Pension pots spent or held in cash as just 25% pay for advice

Many savers who have accessed their pot since pension freedoms have either spent it all or parked it in a savings account, with just 25 per cent paying for advice. The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association has published its latest wave of research on patterns in retirement following the reforms. Based on an initial survey […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. A very timely article, especially with the nSP arriving in a few weeks. It still reads, implicitly to me at least, as if ‘good outcomes’ is concerned only with pension savings.

    What matters to people is their overall bottom line situation. In that, their pension savings may be a major or minor contributor. There will be many with other larger resources and many with average or lower pension savings who have a relatively small ‘outcome’ from them. Planning and understanding, supported by advice or guidance (however defined), must bring together all the relevant elements, including tax, state pensions, means-tested benefits and other resources as well as pension savings.

    Someone with a level of nSP at about the same rate as current state pensions (the majority in April) would not gain a penny in real income from an annuity or regular drawdown because it would simply reduce their Pension Credit entitlement. In fact, taking a lump sum could actually increase their benefit entitlement. Where though can they find that out?

    For younger people, how do they understand that that may be the result in future of choices made today?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm