The current hot topic among family lawyers is “collaborative law”. This is an approach by which both parties in a divorce, and their solicitors, commit to avoid the courtroom. Instead, mediation is used to reach a sensible solution for their “break-up”.But how will this affect the financial services industry? Since the Welfare Reform & Pensions Act 1999 gave powers to the Court to split pension rights between husband and wife on divorce, many solicitors have approached financial advisers for guidance on the best way to approach this complicated area. But there has not exactly been a rush to use the specialist technical knowledge that many advisers could offer. Collaborative law may change this. The settling of financial arrangements on divorce, “ancillary relief” in lawyer speak, is by their own admission “undoubtedly a major flashpoint”. With financial issues pushing the collaborative approach to its limits, it seems inevitable that more and more frequently financial advisers will be called to the table to become part of the professional team couples need. To be active in this area, financial advisers need to bear several points in mind. First, it is futile to think that solicitors will take for granted any specialist knowledge you may have on divorce issues. Despite the myriad of examinations most of us have endured, we are still not deemed, as an industry, “up there” with solicitors on the professional front. Many solicitors do not appreciate the complexity of the issues in hand. So, you must be proactive. It is not just “blowing your own trumpet” about how good you are. Educating solicitors, worrying them even, about just how careful you have to be, particularly when dealing with pensions, is crucial. Solicitors are just like us, in that they are increasing fearful of professional indemnity claims in our “blame culture”. In addition to tutoring on the finer technical de-tails, you need to present a straightforward, procedural approach, which fits with their collaborative stance. Creating a fee structure for each part of this process can help. First, you need to agree with solicitor firms that, as early as possible in their mediation, pension information is made available to you to be assessed for errors and inconsistencies. As part of this audit you will be adding value by making sure that the correct figures are being used. This prevents wasted energy in discussing incomplete, or erroneous valuations. Solicitors should be cautioned – pension providers and scheme administrators are not always correct. Neither are their CETV’s. In the second stage, a financial adviser can prove his or her worth. The Pension Inquiry Form used by the legal profess- ion – or Form P as it is known – gets the bare facts about the pension plans in question. But only with the detailed technical knowledge of a financial adviser can the important questions be asked: l Is there a guaranteed annuity to be considered? l Is there enhanced protection following A-Day? l Does the CETV include any compensation – for example, following an earlier pension review decision – which is, under the rules, not shareable? l What is the funding position of the scheme – is it underfunded and how has this affected the CETV. l What about state benefits, are there any shareable Serps benefits? l If shadow membership is offered, on what terms? They are not always the same, or as beneficial, as the main scheme. It has to be said, this is double-dutch to most solicitors. But, crucial information nevertheless, since the answers to these questions, and a few more, could change beyond recognition, the potential equitable solutions for both parties. The next logical stage in the process is the provision of either a generic report, or more likely, a detailed tome, which is tailored to the specific pension schemes that have been considered. Possible solutions for the division of benefits may be outlined. The last stage following mediated agreement will be the drafting and implementation of a pension attachment or sharing order. The need for a technical eye does not end here. If the Order is wrong, amendments following Decree Absolute require a joint representation to the court prior to implementation. This can prove difficult. Most Orders will specify a percentage split, as the court prefers this. However, if the client is using “Hallam” wording to effect a monetary value sign off from the pension scheme is required in advance. Finally, be aware that you may need to be will- ing to walk away before the product implement-ation stage, if that is what is required. Acting as a partisan adviser during the mediation process may well preclude you, though not always, from acting for only one or the other of the parties at the final stage. In essence, this is what collaboration is all about.
The FSA has fined The Ancient Order of Foresters Friendly Society 55,000 for financial promotion failings. The firm is run by Financial Services Practitioner Panel chairman Mark Rothery.
For those of you who remember the lord of the black dogs and former MM investment hack, you might be interested to know that Matt Davis is now officially married. Again. Having parted our shores for the rolling hills of Portland, Oregon and the lovely Sue, and having had the civil ceremony earlier this year, […]
Flexishare Two Year Stepped Fixed Rate
Rising pension term assurance sales could lead to a fall in sales of critical-illness cover, says CWC Research senior partner Clive Waller. He says most life products sold are term policies with accelerated critical-illness cover but accelerated CI cannot be sold alongside PTA. CI stand-alone insurance is the only CI option available with PTA but […]
US rate rise: A new era to buy and hold quality By Felix Wintle, Head of US Equities Watch Felix Wintle discuss the US’s first rate rising cycle in a decade and why he believes a focus on quality stocks will be key for outperformance in this environment. In the video Felix discusses: The impact […]
- Top trends
- Top trends
- Revealed: The FCA’s findings on ongoing advice
- How much are advisers charging for pension transfers?
- Lifetime allowance 2018/19 increase confirmed but pensions absent
- ATS staff departures continue as platform commits to improved adviser experience
- SJP trainee adviser banned and fined for faking qualifications
News and expert analysis straight to your inboxSign up
Latest from Money Marketing
As the outlook for the UK’s economy remains uncertain, how can advisers prepare portfolios for any change in inflation? As higher inflation fails to appear on the horizon and wages grow faster than expected, fund managers are weighing up their portfolio moves for any potential changes in the economy. The UK consumer prices index rose […]
IFA directors Kevin and Cheryl Neal have been banned from being company directors by the Insolvency Service for six and four years, respectively. The married couple ran the now-defunct Hertfordshire-based Kevin Neal Associates Wealth Management. They were disqualified for taking assets from an insolvent company. The firm had been incorporated to take over the business interests […]
Hartley Pensions has bought the “untainted” assets of the Lifetime Sipp Company, which went into administration earlier this year. An update published today on the website of Lifetime’s administrators Kingston Smith & Partners says Hartley Pensions has also agreed to administer the tainted Sipps held by Lifetime Sipp. The administrator described tainted assets as those where […]