View more on these topics

Govt would face provider Euro challenge over Nest restrictions

DWP-Department-for-work-and-pensions-500x320.jpg

The Government will face a challenge from at least one major UK insurer if it attempts to lift Nest’s restrictions before 2017, Money Marketing understands.

Nest is currently subject to a £4,400 annual cap on contributions and a ban on transfers in or out. The restrictions are due to be reviewed in 2017.

The Department for Work and Pensions has held talks with representatives from across the insurance industry in recent weeks as part of its call for evidence on lifting Nest’s restrictions early.

Two senior figures at major UK providers who have met with DWP officials in the last two weeks say they expect the Government will propose removing Nest’s contribution cap before the 2017 review.

One of the sources says: “We are expecting the contribution cap to be lifted at the very least.

“The DWP’s concern is that employers already find auto-enrolment very complicated and the Nest restrictions are an extra complication they could do without.”

The second source says: “The very strong sense I got from the meeting was the DWP is angling to lift the restrictions early.”

However, Money Marketing has spoken to a senior figure at a third major provider who says it will contest any decision to remove Nest’s restrictions early.

The source says: “The DWP knows if it wants to lift the restrictions it will have to go back to Brussels because they are such a clear feature of the state aid agreement.

“We will absolutely challenge any decision to lift the restrictions early. Nest is a state provider enjoying a very large state subsidy. If you allow it to compete unfettered with the rest of the market then it distorts competition, and that is against EU law.”

Hargreaves Lansdown head of pensions research Tom McPhail says: “Steve Webb should try to lift the restrictions early and the industry needs to focus on the longer term goal of rebuilding consumer trust in the retirement savings industry.”

A DWP spokeswoman says: “We are carefully considering the evidence provided and having further discussions with stakeholders. We will publish a response in due course.”

Money Marketing leader: Euro Nest battle should be avoided

Recommended

FOS attacks lenders for not doing enough to prevent complaints

The Financial Ombudsman Service has hit out at lenders for not doing enough to prevent complaints escalating as it publishes data showing mortgage complaints have risen 25 per cent year-on-year. The FOS’ annual review shows in the year to 31 March there were 11,920 complaints about mortgages, up 25 per cent on the 9,537 complaints […]

CML ‘positive’ about London’s FTB market despite static year-on-year figures

Advances to first-time buyers in London remained flat year-on-year in the first quarter, although the Council of Mortgage Lenders called the figures “positive” because last year’s figures were boosted by the end of the stamp duty holiday. In the first quarter of this year there were 9,400 loans advanced to first-time buyers in the Greater […]

Barnett Waddingham buys Origen Ssas business

Aegon-owned network Origen has sold its Ssas business to Barnett Waddingham. The news comes on the same day Origen announced it has sold its Sipp business to Suffolk Life, in a move which saw it take on over 400 Sipp plans. Origen says the sales have been driven by “increasingly complex needs of clients” and it […]

Abe and Modi

Investment ideas to power returns

We believe the most exciting stockmarket opportunities today are in those places where a new generation of leaders are successfully transforming economies and companies in favour of investors. In a new investment guide and website, which is suitable for use with your clients, we set out our views on these reformers. Click here to find […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Surley once “pot follows member” was announced that was the end for any of NEST’s restrictions?
    Otherwise how can that work when the major pension provider of the future, NEST cannot participate!

  2. Cant we know who the “big 2” are then and why number 3 is afraid of a bit of competition? Makes the article sound made up if we cant give names or even the company concerned.

Leave a comment