View more on these topics

Govt urged to hand savers new pension fund transparency powers

Pension savers should be handed the legal right to ask pension providers and trustees for details on how their money is being invested, says a responsible investment charity.

ShareAction has prepared an amendment to the Pension Schemes Bill that would compel occupational and personal pension schemes and investment intermediaries to give individuals information on their investments.

If included in legislation, the changes would allow savers to ask trustees and managers of personal pension schemes for details including: how investments have been selected; when they were sold; how managers have used their voting rights and engaged with investee companies; and how managers have been selected and monitored.

Liberal Democrat MP for Cheltenham and vice-chair of the all party parliamentary group on responsible investment Martin Horwood is backing ShareAction’s amendment.

He says: “This is needed as part the general trend towards greater company accountability to their shareholders. The Government has done quite a lot to make companies more transparent and accessible to their individual shareholders but most people invest through their pensions, so this is ensuring people can get that kind of info out of their schemes and other institutional investors on behalf of the ordinary saver.”

ShareAction chief executive Catherine Howarth says: “Our amendment would bring much needed transparency into the system. People who invest other people’s retirement savings would no longer be allowed to ignore requests from savers to find out where and how the money is invested.”

Rowley Turton director Scott Gallacher says: “This would create yet more red tape that the financial services and pensions industry can do without.”

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. What planet do these people live on?

  2. Regulator, pension providers, trustees and advisers all saying the clients are confused by so much paperwork.

    How much information can be provided based on a total charge cap of 0.75%. Every day I seem to be reading that some consumer group or politician wants more and more information for consumers, which most will not understand, don’t need and will only increase the costs.

  3. Why not give the consumer the option of paying for the information (take up rate nil, egg on face ShareAction)

  4. … yet we also hear that charges need to fall.

Leave a comment