View more on these topics

Govt to scrap default retirement age from April

The Government will today confirm it will scrap the default retirement age from April 2011.

In July, the coalition announced it was consulting on plans to scrap the default retirement age from October this year.

Employers can currently force an employee to retire at age 65. Their only obligation is to hold a meeting with the staff member to discuss plans at least six months before their 65th birthday. The decision to terminate employment is then solely at the employer’s discretion.

Hargreaves Lansdown head of pensions research Tom McPhail (pictured) says: “This move will probably be unpopular with employers, however its impact on retirement planning may well be profound.
 
“For employees it means there is no fixed end date to which they should set their retirement expectations. The date on which they retire will be up to them and will not be dictated by someone else. Symbolically this is an important shift. It means their retirement is their responsibility, for better or worse and hopefully it will encourage them to plan ahead accordingly.
 
“For employers it means that they will no longer be able to dictate when their employees leave. The most effective way to ensure that someone retires is to make sure that they can afford to retire. In order to achieve this, it will be in employers’ best interests not only to pay money into employees’ pensions but also to encourage employees to take an active interest in their retirement savings. This is a healthy alignment of interests and the Government should be applauded for making it happen.”

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Incompetent Regulators Award Team 13th January 2011 at 10:50 am

    With all those FOS adjudications which gave compo to endowment and pension scheme ‘so called’ mis selling victims that went passed DRA as their products may have gone passed 60 and 65, do firms unjustly awarded againts them get a comeback against the low calibre individuals at the FOS for redress for their lack of understanding and judjement? This was so predictable. FOS adjudicators acting in bad faith under FSMA 2000 get no immunity from personalliability!

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com