View more on these topics

Govt to bag extra £880m from pension freedoms


The Government is set to receive £1.2bn in tax receipts as a result of the pension freedoms, £880m more than it projected in the 2014 Budget.

Pensions consultancy Hymans Robertson estimates that at least £6bn will have been taken out of pensions by the end of the first year of the new freedoms.

This translates to £1.2bn in extra tax for the Exchequer, far higher than the £320m originally earmarked and the 2014 Autumn Statement upward revision of £415m.

Hymans says it expects the pace of withdrawals to increase as providers “respond to Government pressure” and administrative processes are streamlined. It adds growing interest in defined benefit transfers will boost withdrawals further.

The Conservative manifesto also outlined proposals for limiting high earners’ tax relief on pension contributions. In addition, the lifetime allowance is due to drop to £1m from April 2016. Hymans says the impact of this, combined with extra revenue resulting from the freedoms, will boost Treasury coffers by around £3bn.

Hymans Robertson partner Chris Noon says: “Now that we have freedom and choice in pensions, the usual £10bn to £15bn of ‘retiring’ money will be taken out faster than it previously was due to the relative unpopularity of annuities. In other words, the money is less likely to be invested in an income stream for life. Instead the withdrawals are likely to be ‘front loaded’.

“Second, there is around £100bn of available money in the pension pots of the over 55s. We have assumed that 5 per cent of these funds (around £90bn) are withdrawn over the year (around £4.5bn). Previously these individuals would not have drawn on any of this money until they chose to ‘retire’.”

He adds: “Finally, we expect to see some individuals with DB pensions converting some or all of this benefit to a DC fund. They will then typically draw this money much faster than the DB benefit would have been paid. We’ve already seen an increase of 50 per cent in requests for transfer since 6 April.”



How much are advisers charging for pension transfers?

Defined benefit pension transfer charges are being put under the microscope again as the regulator turns over more potential conflicts of interest. With the British Steel Pension Scheme the latest to dominate headlines and the FCA ready to interrogate further as it extends its review to include all firms authorised to give pension transfer advice, […]


Robert Reid: The problems with percentage-based charging

The architects of the RDR made it clear one of its key objectives was to move the power in the market from the manufacturer to the distributor. Given the bulk of the market is still charging on a contingent basis on assets under their advice is it unreasonable to suggest this be revisited by the […]


Emma Thomson: Existing clients are being overlooked

When I made our colleagues aware Legal & General had introduced e-signatures and e-GPRs (medical reports from doctors) there was genuine joy. Such improvements to the new business process is just what is needed. New business processes are regularly tweaked and improved, yet, unfortunately, existing business is the opposite. Processes are clunky and system development […]

How QE is distorting the gilt market

By Mike Riddell The moves in gilts in August were truly exceptional. Volatility in the gilt market (based off 10-year gilt futures) has soared to close to the highest levels seen this millennium, on a par with the eurozone debt crisis of 2011/12 and behind only the global financial crisis of 2008/09. The first distortion […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 10 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Charges for accessing pensions has been in the news recently. MPs are complaining about the exorbitant costs. Quite frankly I am horrified at some of the charges being imposed on clients who want to accept an immediate vesting CETV. It is an absolute disgrace, a scam. The pension transfer qualification in itself belongs to a different world. The exam knows nothing of pension freedom, and looking at the work some of these firms say they have to do to advise on immediate vesting is laughable. The rule that only G60 qualified firms can advise on this type of business should be scrapped.

  2. Couple that with the 1.4 billion fine money he has nicked, nice little war chest and should buy in a few more voters !!

    Pity its good honest people who continue to pay and be penalised ? but hey what does George care you have to be in it win it (as they say)

  3. Ken Durkin – G60 IS ancient history. Much as I loath contributing to the coffers of the CII, RO8 now is a necessary addition I feel

    • G60 is a general term. AF3 is the later qualification. Neither qualification is any use whatsoever when it comes to advising on immediate vesting. The only skill you need is basic arithmetic to know whether it is worthwhile transferring the cash into a SIPP.

  4. Exchequer 1 – Pensioners 0

  5. I am sure that if there were a no liability advice process for pension freedoms then costs would be minimal. Unfortunately in the real world people get selective memory and go to the claims chasers, and fraudsters dump the cost onto honest advisers. You cannot have it both ways, in this country consumer protection carries a high cost, which is not the fault of advisers trying to work within the rules.

    I suspect that R08 will be a mandatory top up to maintain the Tramsfer Specialist licence, or something like it.

  6. Richard Clinton Green 29th June 2015 at 1:42 pm

    Before everybody complains about paying tax on the fund, would you really think that the old system using annuities was really the best option for clients funds because that was the other choice? It was taxable too so all the rubbish about paying tax and war chests does seem very limited in thought and imagination.

  7. Yes, yes we know. (Or at least some of us do).

    That was the whole purpose of these ‘freedoms’. On a cost benefit analysis – how much will the benefits bill be in years to come when these spendthrifts need supporting by the state? I’ll bet it will be significantly more than £1.4 billion.

  8. The rise in basic state pension will take people out of qualifying for benefits if they spend their pensions. Any financial adviser opposed to pension freedom is simply not fit to be a financial adviser.

  9. It is a little worrying when a firm of actuaries, thinks that the overall tax rate paid on the funds withdrawn will only be an average of 20%.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm