View more on these topics

Govt moves to block annual allowance taper loopholes

2094965_HMRC-HM-Revenue-Customs-700x450

People trying to dodge the taper on the pensions annual allowance could be caught by new anti-avoidance measures proposed by the Government.

Details of how the annual allowance taper will work have been published in the first draft of the Finance Bill.

Last week the Chancellor confirmed people with “adjusted incomes” over £150,000 will see their annual allowance begin to drop from £40,000 to a minimum of £10,000 for those with income over £210,000.

In the Finance Bill the Government sets out new rules to combat savers avoiding extra tax charges by deliberately reducing earnings in a tax year or using salary sacrifice.

An explanatory note says the measures will “prevent individuals entering into a salary sacrifice or flexible remuneration arrangement on or after 9 July 2015 in order to reduce their threshold income.”

It adds: “Where this applies, the amount of income given up is added back to the individual’s threshold income.”

Adjusted income is defined as the individual’s net income plus pension contributions, less relief on contributions and certain lump sum death benefits, in a tax year.

Savers below the threshold income will not be affected by the taper.

Threshold income is calculated as adjusted income less the annual allowance, meaning it will be £110,000 in 2016/17.

Talbot & Muir head of pensions technical Claire Trott says: “Although this adds further complications to the calculations it does make it clear that those who should be caught by these measures cannot avoid them if they have the flexibility to move or sacrifice income within their contracts. If this hadn’t been put in place then the measures would be unfair to those with less flexible arrangements who couldn’t avoid being hit.”

But she warns savers will struggle to know how much they can contribute in a year.

She says: “Many people will be unaware of what bonus they may be getting late in the tax year. If there is a danger this may take them over the threshold amount then they will have to either risk that their contributions will be in excess of their reduced allowance and possibly pay an excess charge, or delay contributions altogether.

“Delaying contributions may mean losing them entirely if their employer isn’t flexible enough.”

Recommended

9

Financial Ltd could be wound down in ‘radical’ restructure

Tavistock Investments is considering winding down adviser network Financial Ltd as it looks to restructure the business, Money Marketing understands. Tavistock announced its acquisition of Standard Financial Group, the parent company of Financial Ltd, in January. It paid £500,000 for the business initially, plus a deferred consideration of £2,000 for each adviser who remains with […]

1

F&TRC launches auto-enrolment ratings service

Financial research consultancy F&TRC has launched a new ratings service to help advisers and employers navigate the auto-enrolment landscape. The new service awards providers gold, silver or bronze medals based on their overall proposition. In addition, the following eight sub-categories are rated to highlight specific areas of excellence: Product offering and administration Investment and fund […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Time to employ the wife and pay her max pension.

  2. Simple solution to the problem of the impact of the unknown bonus figure: pay the bonus (shortly) after 5th April rather than before the financial year-end. The next 11 months’ salary figure will be a more predictable number and thereby assist with the pension planning calculations for the ensuing period.

  3. Defined Benefit scheme calculations should be interesting as the accrual figure is only known at the end of the year based on pensionable earnings, by which time you cannot do much about it. I would expect that DB schemes will have to alert members close to the threshold to see if they wish to cease accrual, which might also be necessary in view of the reduced LTA to 1m in future.

    • Depends on the scheme definition of final pensionable earnings, both in terms of what variable pay is included and as at what date it is calculated. But yes, will be problematic for many.

  4. all in all a terrible piece of legislation.

Leave a comment