View more on these topics

Govt figures on impact of MPAA cut a ‘best guess estimate’


The Government appears unclear on the extent of pensions “recycling” it is using to justify cutting the money purchase annual allowance.

In November’s Autumn Statement, Chancellor Philip Hammond announced the MPAA – the annual amount individuals can contribute to defined contribution pensions after having previously accessed flexible benefits – would be slashed by more than half, from £10,000 to £4,000.

The move was defended as a way to stop pension savings being “recycled to take advantage of tax relief”, i.e. to stop those still in work putting money into their defined contribution pensions and drawing out at the same time and saving a 25 per cent tax charge.

The consultation on the cut did not provide precise estimates on how many individuals were taking advantage of this relief, how many would be affected by the cut, or how much tax revenue was generated through breaches of the MPAA.

In response to a Freedom of Information Act request from Money Marketing asking for any estimates or analysis conducted by the Government on how much pension savings are recycled to take advantage of tax relief through the MPAA, the Treasury refers to a policy costings paper from the 2014 Autumn Statement.

The Treasury points to a projected combined cost of introducing the MPAA and new small pots rules of £50m in 2016/17 rising to £120m by 2019/20.

But these estimates pre-date the pension freedoms in 2015, and the Treasury did not provide any further estimates reflecting the MPAA cut announced in the 2016 Autumn Statement.

It could also not provide a precise estimate on the number of people who would potentially be affected by the MPAA cut, saying a “proportion” of those paying more than £4,000 into a DC pension would be affected.

The Treasury sayss: “425,000 people aged 55 or over pay more than £4,000 into a DC pension. A reduction in the MPAA to £4,000 people would only affect the proportion of these people who had flexibly accessed their pension.”

A “best guess estimate”

In a separate FOI request from Old Mutual Wealth, the Treasury said it was “not yet able to identify the number of individuals who are both accessing and saving into their pension”.

Old Mutual Wealth pensions expert Jon Greer says: “Our FOI request reveals the Government’s assessment of the impact of the MPAA is a best guess estimate. Pension freedoms are still in their infancy and the number of people affected by the MPAA is likely to increase in the future. The rule change was targeted at the potential to recycle pension income in order to obtain further tax relief. However, it is the antithesis of flexibility.

“It is not hard to imagine someone in a reasonably senior position reducing work to two or three days a week, taking less pay and topping-up their income with pension withdrawals. As they are still working, they would automatically make pension contributions that could be subject to the MPAA rules.”

The Exchequer expects total benefits from the MPAA cut to be £70m in 2017/18, rising to £75m in 2020/21.

Wingate Financial Planning director Alistair Cunningham says: “I understand the need for an MPAA as it prevents individuals making unlimited withdrawals, and paying them back in benefiting from the tax-free lump sum on the ‘new’ money.

“What I object to is the incessant tinkering – why was it not set to £4,000 initially? This suggests the initial value was an error on the Treasury’s part.”

The consultation on the MPAA reduction closes on 15 February.



MPAA consultation

By Fiona Tait, pensions specialist The chancellor’s announcement of proposed cuts to the Money Purchase Annual Allowance means it will be more important than ever to be able to tell your PCLS from your UFPLS What was in the statement? Not much. The chancellor spared three sentences to inform us that the Money Purchase Annual Allowance will be reduced […]


Govt slashes money purchase annual allowance

Chancellor Philip Hammond has used his Autumn Statement to cut the money purchase annual allowance in more than half. The MPAA – the annual amount individuals can contribute to defined contribution pensions after having previously accessed a pension flexibly – will be slashed from £10,000 to £4,000. The cut will come in to force in April 2017. […]

How to plan ahead for the money purchase annual allowance cut

Earlier this week the Chancellor announced a consultation which proposes to reduce the money purchase annual allowance to £4,000 for those individuals that have accessed their pension flexibly. The Treasury justifies it as follows: “An individual still in work can invest up to £10,000 of their earnings, tax-free, into a pension whilst also drawing out […]

The Day of (B)reckoning

A period of exceptional uncertainty started last Friday for the UK, including a fierce leadership battle in a deeply divided Conservative party, the timing of the trigger of the EU’s Article 50, as well as a potential referendum in Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Click here to read the full article


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. What did we expect it to be, their worst guess?

  2. It would affect me, and I don’t believe I’m unusual. My generation have already had 15% mortgage interest rates, annuity rates at a record low, the credit crunch which helped destroy careers. What an incentive to try and save for retirement. Bring it on!

  3. What about someone who suffers a serious illness, e.g. cancer or stroke, that requires a period out of work on SSP, who decides to flexibly access their pension to pay the bills. If they recover and return to work will they suddenly find they are unable to rebuild their pension fund?
    As Chris states, what an incentive!

  4. With the government encouraging people to work longer and future rises in AE contribution levels, it is inevitable the number of individuals affected by the MPAA will rise. There are other measures that could be put in place to stop TFC recycling without restricting an individuals ability to top up their pension in semi-retirement.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and thought leadership.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm