View more on these topics

Govt: Isas are not a ‘gimmick’ that distracts from pensions

Harrington-Richard 620

The Government has denied using Isas as a “gimmick” to divert money away from pensions.

Speaking in a House of Commons debate yesterday, Scottish National Party pensions spokesman Ian Blackford criticised the Treasury’s recent “Ways to save in 2017” leaflet, which included information on six different types of Isas, child trust funds and premium bonds, but failed to include pensions.

Blackford said this was evidence that the Government had “downgraded” pensions, and that the “gimmick” of Isas was taking money away from pensions saving.

Blackford said: “That is an absolute disgrace, and it confirms my fears that the Government have downgraded the role of pensions and are using the gimmick of Isas to distract attention from pensionable savings.”

Harrington (pictured) said he “must totally disagree” with Blackford’s opinion on how important the Government thinks pensions are, and cited the effort spent communicating auto-enrolment reform as “one of the great successes of this Government.”

Pension charge pressure

Harrington added that the Government supported calls from the FCA to tackle unfair pensions charges after shadow pensions minister Alex Cunningham said that Labour was committed to addressing pension cost transparency.

Cunningham said: “I know that the minister agrees with me on the need for greater transparency in the pensions world, particularly around costs. He will therefore be keen to address the widespread criticism of the Government’s failing to act to ensure that people get the best possible returns. The FCA’s interim report in November highlighted a number of failures in the asset management industry relating to the transparency of costs and charges applied to pension investments, stating that “weak price competition” was having a “material impact” on investment returns.  Labour is committed to implementing all the FCA’s recommendations. Are the Government?”

Again, Harrington on several occasions dismissed calls to offer further transitional payments to the Women Against State Pension Inequality campaign who have been affected by increases to the state pension age.

He said: “The Government have given £1.1 billion of transitional relief for WASPI women. The issue has been discussed in this House very many times and the Government have no plans to do anything further in that respect.”

Work and Pensions Secretary Damian Green also confirmed that the Government was committed to the state pension triple-lock “for the whole of this Parliament.”

Recommended

Alistair Cunningham
1

Alistair Cunningham: The Treasury’s threat to pensions

In May 2015, when Ros Altmann replaced Steve Webb as pensions minister, I made a prediction that this was the beginning of the end for pensions as we knew them, to be replaced by a different form of “long-term savings”. While my anticipated timescales may have been off, I am still unshaken in my belief […]

Cash-Money-Currency-GBP-Pounds-700.jpg

Experts urge FCA to go further on pension fund transaction cost disclosure

Experts have welcomed the FCA’s attempts to force asset managers to disclose transaction costs to pension schemes that invest in their funds, but have urged the regulator to conduct further work on transparency to customers and nuances in fund arrangements. The regulator began consulting in October on plans to to “place a duty on asset […]

Old-Couple-Pension-Pensioners-Elderly-700x450.jpg
17

State pension age should not increase further, PLSA says

The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association says it does not want to see the state pension age increased any more because it would disadvantage groups of people with lower than average life expectancies. In its response to the Independent Review of the State Pension Age, being led by former CBI director general John Cridland, the […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Taxpayer funded Public Sector schemes are the unfairest pension charge, perhaps start there before trying to destroy what is left of what was a relatively efficient system for accumulating retirement provision.

  2. It is all about tax relief cost savings! Just have a flat rate of 25/30% if you want to reduce the Govt costs.

  3. What are the transitional arrangements for 1950s women? First I’ve heard of then

  4. Harrington can deny goverment down grading of pensions in the same way Trump denied mocking that journalist….but we all know the reality. 750,000 employees stage in 2017 so the main way to save in 2017 is into the workplace pension! This new infographic from treasury and HMRC must be withdrawn

  5. When are those daft bunch of woman, led by Anne Keen, going to realise they won’t be getting an extra penny. They should have made proper provision for their old age. The phrase ‘should have gone to supersavers’ is what many are saying.

Leave a comment