View more on these topics

Govt hammers Qrops market with 25% tax charge

Philip Hammond

Qrops transfers will be hit with a 25 per cent tax charge unless they are made within the European Economic Area or the Qrops is provided by the individual’s employer.

Budget documents published today confirm that transfers to Qrops requested on or after 9 March 2017 will be taxable unless, from the point of transfer, both the individual and the pension savings are in the same country, both are within the EEA or the Qrops is provided by the individual’s employer.

Where this is not the case, there will be a 25 per cent tax charge on the transfer and the tax charge will be deducted before the transfer by the scheme administrator or scheme manager of the pension scheme making the transfer.

The Budget also widens the scope of UK taxing provisions so that, following a transfer to a Qrops on or after 6 April 2017, they apply to payments out of those transferred funds in the five tax years following the transfer.

The Treasury says the measure supports its objective of promoting fairness in the tax system. It continues to allow overseas transfers from pension schemes that have had UK tax relief that are made when people leave the UK and take their pension savings with them to their new country of residence.

Payments out of funds transferred to a Qrops on or after 6 April 2017 will be subject to UK tax rules for five tax years after the date of transfer, regardless of where the individual is resident.

Retirement Advantage pensions technical director Andrew Tully says: “This appears to be a significant shutting down of the Qrops market, restricting overseas transfers to situations where people have an overseas employer’s scheme or the Qrops is in the EEA. The Government has been increasingly concerned about the use of these schemes for the past few years and this appears a major move to reduce their use.”



Pete Matthew: Creating a personal advice brand online

Winning a new client is a real achievement, especially in these cynical times. We forget what a massive step it is for prospects to set foot in our offices. They come with all kinds of fears, such as that they are going to be ripped off or made to feel financially inept. Winning a client […]


Succession acquires female advice firm Independent Women

Succession has acquired IFA Independent Women, a firm dedicated to providing financial advice for women, for an undisclosed sum Managing director Lesley Mackintosh will stay at the business, which she founded in 1997. Independent Women’s specialist advice will be available throughout Succession Group’s regional network of client-servicing hubs. As well as savings, investment and retirement […]

Cricket - thumbnail

England vs Australia: pensions

Well, the cricket season is here, and England and Australia are stepping up to the wicket. Although we compete with each other in the sporting world, when it comes to pensions, Australia’s pension programme is held up as a model for our auto-enrolment initiative. Auto-enrolment was introduced because people weren’t saving enough into their pensions, and it is still early days but signs are positive. However, in Australia, saving into a pension is compulsory, and in fact employers are the ones who have to pay in. Employees in Australia can make additional contributions into their pensions, but they don’t have to. Should the onus be on the employer or employee to save? Well in the UK we think it’s both, but to get ‘adequate’ savings for retirement it’s the employee who has to pay more in.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.


    Out with the unregulated cowboys and product sellers. About time to.
    The professional tax planners and advisers can work with the new rules, where ROPS are a solution.

    • The measures introduced punish those who move out of the EEA (which the UK itself has voted to do) to countries where there is no established trust sector. This encompasses the retirement destinations of many expats.

      Another pernicious effect is that it prevents those with no connection with the UK from taking their pensions home.

      Please note that the UK does not have a monopoly on good advice (indeed the UK seems to have major issues with misselling and scams using domestic products such as SIPPs and SSASs).

      Recognise this for what it is – a tax grab on the disenfranchised – and watch out your UK pension is next when the move to TEE happens.

Leave a comment