View more on these topics

Govt draft rules on CC ban fail to tackle ‘back door’ payments

Pensions minister Steve Webb

The Government’s draft rules to ban consultancy charging for automatic enrolment do not go far enough to tackle “back door” payments between providers and advisers, according to Aviva.

Pensions minister Steve Webb has today laid out draft regulations before Parliament to ban consultancy charges for auto-enrolment schemes, following its decision to do so in May.

In a written ministerial statement, Webb says: “Under the draft regulations, a scheme with a provision allowing amounts to be deducted from a jobholder’s pension pot or contributions will not be an automatic enrolment scheme if that amount is to be paid to a third party under an agreement between the employer and the third party.

“These draft regulations will not affect pension schemes where there was a legally enforceable agreement in place between an employer and a third party before 10 May 2013.”

But Aviva corporate benefits head of policy John Lawson points out the draft wording refers to payments between employers and a third party, rather than providers and a third party.

He says although commission is now banned under the RDR, members still pay for things like marketing and communication out of their pension charges.

Members also pay for “blended” fund charges, where employee benefit consultants are paid for constructing a default fund on behalf of an employer by increasing members’ annual management charge.

Lawson says: “There are charges out there which do not appear to be banned by this wording, and you may find there are back door ways around this. Things like blended fund charges and education and communication payments all inflate the charge the member pays, and in many ways these are no different from consultancy charges or commission.

“As the Government is knocking off the sorts of payments that can be made out of pension schemes, it is surprising it has not gone the full hog on this.”

The Government plans to consult in the autumn on extending the ban on consultancy charges to all qualifying schemes, rather than just auto-enrolment schemes.

Draft regulations imposing the consultancy charging ban are expected to come into force by November at the latest.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. What a surprise. GPPs always were a cesspit of nefarious practices. I remember as far back as the late 80’s bungs passing between advisers and those responsible for buying the GPP for their firms. It went under the title of commission rebate – except that the person getting the rebate was often not a member, but had other (better) arrangements in place.

  2. The Elephant In The Room 1st July 2013 at 2:48 pm

    Good grief – Lawson’s right! It would be like levying a 1.8% contribution charge on all member payments into their pension. Oh wait a minute! Silly me – I’m getting all mixed up – that’s the NEST scheme. Still it won’t take long to repay it, it’s only £171M after all (at the last count). But that’s okay, as it’s a Government back quango (sort of) – not one of those private sector cowboys!

    How dare you advisers expect payment for encouraging companies and employers alike to start saving for their future!

    All hail to Mr Webb – and for Mr Lawson for his smoke blowing antics.

    Funny enough my Aviva annual PMI premium has just increased by 45% on its 1st anniversary – and that’s apparently AFTER after a 59% no claims discount. Is that ethical Mr Lawson? You now being the self-proclaimed bastion of moral corporate behaviour!

  3. You didn’t expect Steve ‘I make it up depending upon the latest Which survey’ Webb to get this right first time did you?

Leave a comment