View more on these topics

Govt criticised over £13bn GMP equalisation plans

The Government is facing mounting industry opposition over plans to equalise guaranteed minimum pension payments between men and women.

GMPs are the minimum level of pension an occupational scheme must provide to people who contracted-out of Serps between April 6, 1978 and April 5, 1997.

On May 17, 1990 the European Court of Justice ruled that occupational pensions were a form of deferred pay and, as such, it was unlawful to discriminate between men and women.

It was subsequently decided by the Court that the decision applied to any pension that accrued from the date of the judgment, including GMPs.

However, GMPs accrue at different rates for men and women and are payable at different ages. Despite the ruling, virtually all schemes have ignored the sex inequalities that exist in the calculation of the payments.

The Government now wants all schemes to comply with European law by equalising all GMPs that have accrued since May 17, 1990. In January, the DWP proposed an equalisation method which relies on a comparison between a member’s GMP and their GMP had they been of the opposite sex.

The DWP says schemes should then pay the higher of the amount the member would receive under scheme rules and the amount they would have received under the rules were they of the opposite sex.

A joint letter from seven influential trade bodies, including the ABI and the NAPF, urges pensions minister Steve Webb to reconsider the proposed method, which they say is complicated and will cost schemes around £13bn.

The letter says: “The method is probably the most expensive of those that the DWP could have chosen to support. It works on the assumption that every instalment of a member’s pension would be calculated twice, the first time based on male benefits and the second based on female benefits.

“In our view this is unjustified expense: a more appropriate method would focus on raising the overall value of benefits for the gender with the lower actuarial value up to the higher actuarial value of the other gender.”

Recommended

Nucleus hires IFA communications manager

Nucleus has appointed Faith Liversedge as IFA communications manager. Liversedge steps into the newly-created role from Bright Grey where she was marketing consultant, responsible for print, digital and sales campaigns. She previously held similar roles at Prudential and Standard Life wrap. Liversedge will report to Nucleus communications director Rebecca Christensen-Rennie and will be responsible for […]

Moody’s puts Man Group on review for potential downgrade

Moody’s has put asset manager Man Group’s ratings on review for a possible downgrade, after highlighting a number of concerns. The ratings agency says “ongoing pressures on earnings, margins and funds under management growth” were a challenge for the firm. “This is the result of general market pressures as well as weaker sales of guaranteed […]

European markets bounce back after heavy falls

European markets have rebounded today after recording heavy losses on Tuesday following below-par US jobs data and mixed trading signals from China. At 14.24, the FTSE 100 was up 0.8 per cent to stand at 5640.62, while across Europe the French Cac 40 and the German Dax were both up 1.4 per cent. Barclays has […]

2

Zurich platform sales head exits

Zurich Financial Services head of platform distribution Jaki Platt has left the business. She joined Zurich as area sales director in July 2009 and took up the position of head of platform distribution in April last year. Platt has previously been head of retail at Scottish Widows Investment Partnership from April 2001 to December 2002 […]

Mothers missing out on millions

By Steve Webb, director of policy and external communications The ninth Royal London Policy Paper discusses how thousands of mothers are missing out on state pension rights when they don’t have to Earlier this month we published the ninth Royal London Policy Paper, entitled ‘Mothers Missing out on Millions’. It focuses on the thousands of mothers […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Why worry? Give all employees the option to catch up on their back/missed payments since 1990 (matched of course by the employer contribution). Failing that just wind up all schemes since the date of the EC ruling and start again or increase everyone’s contribution to the level needed. What – employees can’t afford it? There’s a recession on? Surely not. The view from the ivory tower must be spectacular.

    Aren’t politicians, lawyers and the PC brigade just wonderful?

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com