View more on these topics

Govt considers governance committees for contract-based pensions


The Government is considering proposals to force pension providers to set up independent governance committees to oversee contract-based schemes.

The Government has today published its formal response to the work and pensions select committee’s report on governance and best practice in workplace pensions.

One of the committee’s key recommendations was for the Government and regulators to investigate ways of assisting employers to set up governance committees for contract-based pension schemes.

In its response to the report, the Government says: “There are a number of facets to good governance, but one critical element we wish to explore is whether all schemes should have a body overseeing them which represents the interests of members.

“Within trust-based schemes the trustee board has such a responsibility and we know that in contract-based schemes some employers have a governance committee, as they see such arrangements as beneficial for both themselves and the scheme members.

“However, we do not think it is realistic to replicate the employer-specific governance committee arrangement for each employer in large scale group personal pension schemes, given the number of employers involved and the size of many of them.

“Therefore we will be exploring whether there are alternative options for contract-based schemes, to avoid requiring member committees for each employer. 

“This could be at provider level, or some intermediate arrangement, though we would not wish to preclude employers who wish to set up governance committees from doing so.”

The Government also rejects the committee’s call for the creation of a single regulator to oversee pensions. Pensions regulation is currently split between the Financial Conduct Authority and The Pensions Regulator.

The FCA and TPR will, however, publish a joint document in the autumn setting out how the regulation of workplace pensions operates.

The Government says: “We believe that the overall regulatory architecture is sound and, given there will always be a boundary between the roles of the FCA and TPR, there are currently no plans to fundamentally change the arrangements for regulating contract-based schemes at this time.

“In addition, we believe that it is too soon after the creation of the FCA and less than a year into automatic enrolment to consider whether the current regulatory framework and divisions of responsibility are appropriate.”


FCA agrees £380k landbanking settlement for investors

The Financial Conduct Authority has agreed a High Court settlement to return around £380,000 to investors in a land bank. The case concerned St Clair Estates which owned a disused airfield in Winkleigh, Devon and divided it into separate plots in 2006. The FCA believes more than 70 investors paid between £6,000 and £12,000 for […]


Upper Tribunal upholds FCA ban on insurance broker

The Upper Tribunal has upheld the Financial Conduct Authority’s decision to ban and fine an insurance broker for fraud. Jeffery Flanders director Andrew Jeffery was fined £150,000 and banned on 20 January 2010 but appealed the decision. The tribunal’s judgment was issued on 27 June after a 16 day hearing in December 2012 and January […]

Chelsea BS shaves 5bps off two-year deal to stay at top of best-buy

Chelsea Building Society has shaved a further five basis points from its flagship two-year fixed rate mortgage in an effort to stay at the top of the best-buy tables. The direct-only product is now available at 1.64 per cent for a £1,545 fee. Before the cut, the product was available to 60 per cent loan-to-value, […]

CGT entrepreneurs' relief

Entrepreneurs’ relief is due, subject to meeting certain conditions, in respect of capital gains arising on ‘material disposals of business assets’. These ‘business assets’ include: Read more


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Providers have the FCA and TCF. Why is this needed. The frameworks to look after policyholders already exists.

  2. Julian Stevens 2nd July 2013 at 9:47 am

    A better strategy would be for the government to set up an independent governance committee to oversee the activities of the various regulatory bodies with a view to preventing them from mauling the industry to death. The regulator has the teeth and the claws and uses them regularly. But what do we have with which to defend ourselves?

    The increasingly sharp and penetrating questions being asked by the TSC of the FCA and the MAS surely constitute clear evidence that this is what’s needed. The problem is that the TSC is ultimately toothless ~ if the responses it receives to its questions are incomplete, unsatisfactory or downright obfuscatory, it has no power actually to do anything about it. That surely needs to be addressed.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm