View more on these topics

Govt rejects default pathways for decumulation

The government has rejected a recommendation to introduce default decumulation pathways saying it would be inconsistent with pension freedoms.

In April the work and pensions select committee published a report on pension freedoms where it proposed ways outcomes for savers could be improved.

Among the recommendations, the committee said every drawdown provider should offer customers a default drawdown solution and this should be subject to oversight by trustees of independent governance committees.

The committee also suggested drawdown should be price capped with an annual management charge of 0.75 per cent.

In its response the Department for Work and Pensions says the pension freedoms deliberately moved away from the idea of defaulting individuals into a single product, namely annuities.

It says there is a lack of evidence that a common default pathway would be suitable for the majority of people.

The DWP says: “We await the publication of the FCA’s final retirement outcomes review in summer 2018 in order to consider fully its proposals on decumulation pathways, a charge cap on decumulation products and extending the role of independent governance committees.

“The government will continue to engage with the FCA, industry and consumer groups, to ensure that customers are treated fairly and benefit from appropriate protections.”

The committee also said there is a clear role for automated services in providing cheaper advice.

Its report called on the FCA to conduct and publish a review comparing consumer outcomes from face-to-face and automated advice.

Here the government says it recognises the importance of ensuring that consumer outcomes from face-to-face and automated advice are of a high standard and supports the FCA’s work in this area.

Royal London policy director Steve Webb says: “The government is right to reject the idea of a one-size fits all approach at retirement.

“The whole point of pension freedoms is that everyone is different and has a different pension history and different goals for the future when they reach pension age.

“Much more can and should be done to help people make the choice that is right for them, but defaulting them down the route that the provider thinks is best is not the answer.”



Adrian Boulding: Advisers should not feel threatened by default drawdown

The work and pensions committee’s recent recommendation that drawdown providers offer a 0.75 per cent charging ‘default decumulation pathway’ by April 2019 has hit the headlines. The idea is that it will protect disengaged customers who may make poor investment and decumulation choices. Either trustees or independent governance committees would choose both a default fund […]

Is default drawdown a realistic proposition?

Default models have proved successful for accumulation but can the same be said for drawdown? When an idea works, it is natural to see if it can successfully be applied to something else. So it should come as no surprise that MPs are calling for default decumulation options to emulate the success auto-enrolment has had […]


MPs call for FCA probe into face-to-face versus automated advice

The work and pensions select committee wants the FCA to compare consumer outcomes from face-to-face and automated advice. In the final report of its inquiry into pension freedom and choice, published today, the committee makes a number of recommendations it believes will help boost engagement around retirement options. The inquiry was launched in September last […]


Paul Lewis: Advisers and financial journalists are one and the same

Advisers and financial journalists must support each other more in our different roles. After all, we both exist for the same reason Why do financial journalists exist? I am sure that it is a question many IFAs ask, especially when they read things they think are wrong, dangerous or fail to end with “find a […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Also, this is approach is extremely consistent with the Government’s approach to auto enrolment…


  2. Julian Stevens 23rd June 2018 at 4:55 am

    If clients/policyholders haven’t supplied details of a bank account into which payments can be remitted, how could the provider set up IDD on a default basis?

    Also, what level of default IDD has been proposed? Anything other than natural income or a sensibly prudent percentage of the ongoing value of the fund (e.g. 4% p.a.) raises the spectre of pound:cost ravaging, that being the single biggest risk of IDD.

    I still hold to the view that the only default for maturing pension funds should be OM, with a voucher system to cover (at least most of) the costs of advice.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm