View more on these topics

Good and bad rules

It feels like we have been living in the aftermath of the credit crisis forever. The amount of legislation that has been coming out and is met with “here we go again, more fallout from the credit crisis” knows no bounds, it seems.

This is particularly true at a European level where we at the Investment Management Association are currently trying to keep on top of 35 different pieces of legislation. Add to that, regulation and legislation from the FSA and UK Parliament.

Is it right that the response has been to regulate, regulate, regulate? In some cases, yes, it is. In others, it is not. Speaking at a conference in Brussels last week, IMA chief executive Richard Saunders argued that a misplaced analysis of the crisis has led to some of the regulation we are now seeing. He explained that the analysis under-played the role of the banks which created the crisis and over-played the role of hedge funds which did not create the crisis.

No part of the financial services industry is immune from the changes and that includes financial advisers.

At a national level, most significant are obviously the FSA’s RDR proposals and the new regulatory structure which will lead to not one but two regulators taking over from the FSA. How that will work remains to be seen.

Advisers must also keep their eyes on the ball to ensure they are not caught out by EU proposals. That is not to say that all EU legislation is bad, some of it is actually quite promising.

Take the packaged retail investment products initiative, which attempts to level the playing field across all investment products in terms of marketing and disclosure. Leaving aside the odd quibble with some things that have been left out of the proposals, Prips are good for investors and advisers who will be able to better compare different products.

Consumer protection has become all the more important when drafting legislation and that cannot be a bad thing. Advisers need to be able to assure their clients that they are well protected when making investment decisions. But sometimes the consumer protection mantra has been used incorrectly.

The alternative investment fund managers directive is a case in point. It sought to deal with the impact of the Madoff scandal, a fraudulent investment scheme, in which many investors lost money. Rather than trying to address the issue of why investors had ended up in those funds, the tactic was to make depositaries liable for more.

One current proposal with a big impact on investors would be the financial transaction tax. Although pitched as a tax on the City, this is not what the FTT is.

Rather it is a tax on investors and advisers will have to explain to them that they will have to pay yet more tax for the privilege of investing in the markets.

At a time when saving should be encouraged, the FTT sends all the wrong messages.

Back to my earlier point – not all regulation is bad and reform is necessary. It just needs to be well targeted and well thought through.

Mona Patel is head of communications at the Investment Management Association


Treasury U-turns on scrapping pensions compensation relief

The Government has abandoned plans to scrap tax-relief for compensation payments related to pension misselling. A Treasury consultation, published in June, proposed removing the relief in the Finance Bill 2012. Under current rules, compensation payments made in connection with personal pensions that were missold between 1988 and 1994 are not subject to income tax or […]

Aegon is aiming to offer a wide range of annuities on platform

Aegon UK plans to integrate a portal or specialist annuity service into its employee benefits platform to offer a whole of market range of annuities. Aegon Retirement Choices soft-launched to around 50 adviser firms on November 14 and is tendering for portals or specialist annuity services, saying it expects to reach an agreement before the […]

Neptune appoints assistant manager for income fund

Neptune Investment Managers has appointed George Boyd-Bowman as assistant manager on the Neptune Income fund. Neptune chief executive Robin Geffen says: “I have just added Boyd-Bowman to the list of assistant fund managers on this fund.” Boyd-Bowman joins lead manager Alex Breese and deputy manager Emma Stanford on the fund.

George Osborne defends ‘unreliable’ OBR projections

Chancellor George Osborne has defended the Office for Budget Responsibility after it was suggested its economic forecasting was too unreliable to base policy on. Earlier this week Capital Economics managing director told the Treasury select committee that Government should question the extent to which it relies on OBR projections to develop policy. Giving evidence to […]

Introducing Trevor Greetham

Ryan Medlock, Investment Proposition Manager, Royal London Royal London Asset Management’s (RLAM) new head of multi-asset is officially up and running. I want to look at what expertise Trevor brings to the table and how this affects the Governed Portfolios (GPs) and Governed Retirement Income Portfolios (GRIPs). Trevor Greetham joined RLAM in April 2015 from […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Centaur comment testing

Leave a comment