View more on these topics

Give Aifa credit for facing up to an untouchable opponent

THE EDITOR’S COMMENT OF THE WEEK

All these vitriolic cries of opposition to Aifa opening up to restricted advice appear to overlook the fact that “the regulator has changed the goalposts about what it considers independence to be”. Independence after the RDR is going to impose a set of criteria that will be all but impossible to meet in the real world.

Consider a pair of hypothetical clients called Mr & Mrs Jones who run their own small business and who approach a fully fledged IFA for comprehensive advice on a retirement savings strategy, including, but by no means limited to, pensions. Just the pension part will have to include PPs, SSASs and Sipps, not to mention all the options available via the latter two. Then we have all the options available at retirement that a full IFA will be expected to explore, explain, compare and discuss. Also, Mr & Mrs Jones are fairly well aware of all the negative sentiment towards pensions, and they manage to divide their income to avoid higher-rate income tax, so they also want advice on other longterm investment vehicles, including property, directly held stocks and shares, collectives, VCTs, EISs, Ucis, structured products, onshore and offshore packaged products, etc. The report to cover them all will be so voluminous that the bill for its preparation cannot possibly be less than £5,000.

Just what is the FSA trying to achieve by decreeing that anyone who cannot provide such a report will no longer be allowed to call themselves independent but must call themselves restricted, with all the negative connotations? Bonkers and divorced from the real world.

As for Aifa’s achievements, there do appear to be two. First, it did manage to persuade the FSA to reduce the share of its total levy bill apportioned to the IFA sector, even though the FSA has since devised other mechanisms with which to bleed us nearly dry.

Second, Aifa has managed to secure from the FSA approval for a route to QCF level four which is cost-effective, relevant and (I hope) manageable for all us old codgers who could not cope with a CII-style programme of exams.

Aifa is not a total waste of space and we have to bear in mind that it is up against a heavily armed and armour-plated leviathan that is so unaccountable that it does not even have to take much, if any, notice of the Treasury select committee. We ought perhaps to give Aifa at least some credit for doing its level best in the face of an almost untouchable opponent.

Julian Stevens
Harvest IFMADVICE

Recommended

Northern Rock losses halved

Northern Rock has halved its losses to £68.5m in the first half of the 2011 and has announced that it expects to begin trading profitably in the second half of 2012. The £68.5m statutory loss compares to a £142.6m loss in the first half of 2011, a fall in losses of almost 52 per cent. […]

LV= appoints managing director of protection

LV= has appointed former Legal & General sales director for IFA protection Iain Clark as managing director of protection. Mark Jones, head of protection products, and Mike Farrell, head of protection sales, will report to Clark. Clark has 24 years experience in the protection market. He says: “LV= is increasingly being seen as a strong […]

Meet the gold gurus

Gold passed £1,000 an ounce last week for the first time. How fortunate, then, that I had the benefit of the opinions of BlackRock’s Catherine Raw and Mark Lacey from Investec on commodities not so very long ago. I have previously mentioned that the Cofunds roundtable I chaired, and to which Raw and Lacey contributed, […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Quite. Independence rests on two things only, and neither have anything to do with product. They are state of mind and being the client’s agent.

    IFA’s are by and large a very independently minded bunch, and that does not sit well with failed corporatists like the FSA and Sants. At the same time being the clients agent is a very simple idea.

    The RDR has nil to do with improving outcomes for consumers but all to do with proto-nationalisation of the IFA sector as the Failed FSA has accomplished with the rest of the FS sector, especially the banks.

  2. Regarding the Aifa level 4 qualification – can’t help thinking they were panicked into doing this when they realised they had made a colossal mistake by rejecting grandfathering.

    After all, qualifications fall under the remit of professional bodies, not trade bodies.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com