View more on these topics

Garry Heath: More to FCA ‘no confidence’ debate than meets the eye


For the first time in over 30 years of regulation, last week saw MPs debate a vote of no confidence in the FCA. The result was meaningless. The fact it happened will resound around Westminster for months and is part of something much bigger.

The debate was particularly dangerous for Chancellor George Osborne. It was the public demonstration of an increasing backbench disgust of the Treasury’s kowtowing to big interests. And it is not just regulation but the likes of Google and other sweetheart deals too.

Public anger is growing not only in the UK but also across the Atlantic. The unlikely rise of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders is a direct result of the public believing their leaders have sold out to the big players.

The FCA is attempting to deliver two contrary objectives. The official one is to protect consumers. However, the hidden objective is to act as the Government’s financial services undertaker by burying embarrassing issues, many of which derive from Treasury decisions.

It is clear powerful players are influencing the Treasury to get their way. If the banks are granted a soft touch, the danger to advisers is immense. This means regulators will need to attack someone – and advisers will be right in the firing line.

Osborne will parade new FCA chief executive Andrew Bailey as the solution. He is not. Only proper accountability will deliver proper regulation. Advisers cannot remain silent. Otherwise the powerful will out-manoeuvre them.

Garry Heath is director general of Libertatem


Acquisition costs hit Henderson profits as retail assets surge to £57bn

Significant acquisition costs weighed on Henderson’s profits last year as net retail flows of £8bn helped boost assets under management to £57bn. The firm’s full year results for 2015, published today, reveal pre-tax profits dropped 41 per cent year-on-year, from £283.4m to £167.9m, primarily due to acquisition and disposal costs, and other non-recurring items totalling […]


Cyber criminals hack HMRC to access tax returns

Cyber criminals are reportedly stealing money by hacking into the systems of HM Revenue & Customs to hijack self-assessment records. The Sunday Times reports that HMRC intercepted approximately 17,000 attempts to make fraudulent or incorrect tax repayment claims, worth nearly £100m last year. However, it says HMRC has been unable to fend off all the […]

Seeking quality in uncertain markets

By Ewan McAlpine, Senior Client Portfolio Manager In uncertain times, investors naturally seek safety. But in fixed income markets, what does that really mean? Ewan McAlpine outlines the approach RLAM’s Fixed Income Team will be adopting across its credit funds in response to potentially volatile markets this year. Click here for full article

Rock Caspar Architas 2014

Architas’ Caspar Rock: Taking the long view in times of volatility

Architas chief investment officer Caspar Rock explains why he’s backing longer-dated bonds and considers the implications of the UK potentially leaving the EU this year. Long duration assets Despite the strong run in gilts, especially very long-dated ones, duration in fixed income portfolios is still a vital means of diversification. The markets remain fixated on […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Not really clear what this ‘article’ is about? Demonstration of a conspiracy theory? Highly subjective opinion is not really effective or useful journalism.

  2. The banks are so big, so powerful, so labyrinthine and have so much covert influence behind the scenes as to be all but unregulatable, whilst advisers have always been easier, weaker targets for micro-managerial regulation. ‘Twas ever thus.

    When Garry talks of proper accountability, on whose part does he mean?

  3. @Matt Amber. This is clearly an opinion piece and not intended as a news story. Pretty sure most of us in the audience recognise Garry and know this.

  4. @Garry, I agree with you as to accountability, but we need to question the role and remit of this style of regulation i.e. a body with very loose objectives and extensive supervisory powers. The reality is that their model of attempting to *supervise* is expensive in terms of both what it achieves and compliance costs.

    A far more efficient model would be for firms to be regulated by laws (remember those?) that codify (say) advisers’ obligations, and by ease of access by consumers to proper Courts (rather than the random FOS). The role & remit of the Supervisor should be restricted to supervising large concerns with scope for discretion removed.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm