View more on these topics

FSCS U-turns on compensation for Rockingham ARM investors


Up to 70 investors in ARM Asset Backed Securities may now be able to seek compensation for bad financial advice after the Financial Services Compensation Scheme agreed to reconsider their cases.

The FSCS said in 2013 that investors could not seek compensation over their purchase of ARM bonds, declaring that advisers representing Rockingham Independent were only liable under limited circumstances.

However, the lifeboat fund has now identified 70 claims which show evidence that Rockingham, which was declared in default in 2012, failed to act on information it had about the authorisation status of ARM.

The ARM Bonds were distributed in the UK by Catalyst Investment Group, which sold them via a number of advisers including Rockingham.

Out of the 2,000 UK investors that invested a total of £75m into ARM, at least 200 sales were advised by Rockingham.

The FSCS initially found that investor losses were causes by a decision from the Luxembourg regulator to reject ARM’s application for authorisation, which Rockingham was not legally responsible for warning investors about.

As a result, it said that investors would not be able to pursue compensation.

The FSCS will write to all potential claimants to inform them of the decision, while those who remain unaffected will also be told that there is insufficient evidence to support their claim.

Claimants who have already been compensated up to the FSCS’ investment limit of £50,000 from a successful claim against Catalyst will not have their cases reassessed.



Intrinsic hikes AR fees to meet ‘unprecedented’ FSCS levy

Intrinsic is to hike adviser fees from January 2016 to help it meet an “unprecedented” rise in the cost of regulation. In a letter sent to advisers last week, the Old Mutual-owned network said its FSCS bill was £5.5m, £2.8m more than was expected. Intrinsic says it has absorbed around half the cost of the […]


TSC member: Govt could use bank fines to cut FSCS levy

The influential Treasury select committee is preparing to turn its guns on the Financial Services Compensation Scheme levy amid concerns about rising advice costs. TSC member and Conservative MP Mark Garnier has called for a debate on how bank fines are distributed, suggesting they could be used to cut the FSCS levy. Speaking at the Conservative […]


FSCS reviews Rockingham claims rejection as ‘new evidence’ emerges

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme is reviewing its decision to reject claims from clients of Rockingham Independent who invested in a Luxenbourg-based life settlement vehicle. In March, the FSCS issued a statement saying Rockingham clients who invested in ARM Asset Backed Securities would receive no compensation for their losses. However, the FSCS says it is […]


FSCS rules out compensation for Rockingham ARM investors

Rockingham Independent clients who invested in a troubled Luxembourg-based life settlement vehicle will not receive compensation for their losses from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. ARM Asset Backed Securities issued bonds based on life settlement policies without the appropriate permissions which were sold to investors in the UK and Europe. The UK distributor of ARM […]

When will US rates rise?

By Felix Wintle, Investment Director & Head of US Equities The most recent communication from Federal Reserve chair Janet Yellen has put the market’s sights on September as the most likely month for the first rate rise. This is due to the stronger than expected economic data of late, particularly in employment and housing, which […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 8 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Tim 16th October 2015 at 12:36 pm

    I’ll get my cheque book…

    • Tim when you (in good time) send a cheque, can i suggest dubbing a bit of perfume on it, like I do….. after all if you consider what they do to us we may as well get them in the mood

  2. If Rockingham knew that ARM was not authorised, surely investors should be told.

  3. Another one for the FAMR

  4. So who at the FSCS decided in 2013 that Rockingham investors did not have a duty to disclose the matter to affected investors and who presided over such a decision? This is worrying, especially if they are still in office. Did the CEO know about this? Lots of questions about which we who fund the scheme deserve answers and accountability.

  5. Oh good – all helps towards boosting next years bill. Keep up the good work chaps

  6. The sooner we get certain more ‘fanciful’ products ring-fenced outside the FSCS safety net, the better

  7. As a mortgage and protection advisor, will I also have to contribute to this mess?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm