View more on these topics

FSCS opens up to more Harlequin claims against advisers

Sea-Sand-Beach-Vacation-Holiday-700.jpgAdvisers will be in the firing line as the Financial Services Compensation Scheme begins considering claims against IFAs who told clients to invest directly in property scheme Harlequin.

Harlequin marketed and built overseas luxury property and has come under investigation by the Serious Fraud Office after some developments never materialised and high commissions came under fire. Investments were commonly made from pensioners through Sipps.

While the FSCS has said negligent mortgage advice and advice to pension switch into underlying Harlequin resorts was already receiving payouts, the lifeboat fund had decided that direct investment advice should now also fall in scope.

SFO charges Harlequin boss with fraud

A statement on the FSCS’ website reads: “More people may now have a claim for bad investment advice in relation to Harlequin investments, following a review by FSCS.

“FSCS is now widening the net to include claims for negligent advice to invest directly in Harlequin after new evidence obtained through its recoveries action shows the products are likely to be unregulated collective investment schemes.

“This paves the way for more people who may have been mis-sold a Harlequin product by their financial adviser to make a claim for compensation.”

Money Marketing has previously reported on a number of FSCS decisions that have awarded compensation over bad advice surrounding Harlequin, where the Financial Ombudsman Service had previously rejected the complaint.



SFO charges Harlequin boss with fraud

The Serious Fraud Office has charged Harlequin Group chairman David Ames with fraud. The SFO has been carrying out a joint investigation with Essex Police into collapsed property firm Harlequin since 2013. It has announced today it is charging Ames with three counts of fraud by abuse of position. Ames has been summoned to appear […]


IFA firm future in doubt after FOS upholds Harlequin investment complaint

A Kent-based advice firm is questioning its future after a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service related to a Harlequin property investment was upheld against it. The decision, published by the FOS in September, relates to a client who was advised by Foreman Financial Services, trading as GraingerCo Financial Services, to transfer his pension to […]


Harlequin chairman’s son jailed for 3 years for £1.6m fraud

The son of overseas property firm Harlequin’s chairman David Ames has been sentenced to more than three years in prison for carrying out a £1.6m Ponzi scheme fraud. Matthew Ames was last week sentenced at Isleworth County Court to three years and four months in jail after setting up bogus carbon credit and teak tree […]

Race track

People’s Pension boss: Advisers can meet auto-enrolment’s challenges

The introduction of automatic enrolment pension schemes in 2012 was a transformative move for the UK pensions industry. As a result, nearly 8 million people now save into workplace pensions via automatic enrolment, according to the Department of Work and Pensions. However, the journey doesn’t stop here and there are challenges ahead for advisers and […]

Pension savings-2015

Pension tax relief: parked (for the moment)

The national news agenda has been dominated by pension issues this month. For those that missed it (and there cannot have been many given that this was the lead story in spoken and written media), the Chancellor announced a decision to make no decision on pension tax relief in his 16 March 2016 Budget speech. To […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. It’s ok. I already had my cheque book out.

  2. … they ‘are likely to be’ unregulated collective investment schemes. So come on, let’s put paid to any regulated adviser, bank or firm being able to recommend (let alone transact) investment business via anything that does not carry regulatory permission/sanction.

    We part-fund the FSCS, so we should be able to decide what is in and what is out going forward. Enough already, we cannot change the past but surely we can shape the future?

    I am tired of hearing about the sort of rubbish that some of our sector is allowed to promote on a daily basis to the public.

    …and don’t get me started on some of the behaviour I am hearing about in the pension transfer business market! You know who you are and what I mean!!

Leave a comment