View more on these topics

FSCS getting desperate over Keydata legal battle

Paul-McMillan-MM-Peach-700.jpg

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme appears to be getting desperate in its legal battle to claw back Keydata costs.

This week we report changes to the criteria for firms to be made lead defendants in the FSCS’s long-running battle to recoup £75m of the £400m paid out in Keydata claims.

Originally, lead defendants were required to have insurance and legal representation and have advised on both Lifemark and SLS-backed Keydata products.

With five of six lead defendants settling already, and the sixth close behind, the FSCS has changed its position. Firms without insurance or legal representation can now be selected as replacements if claims against them are over £150,000.

Lawyers warn these firms may have to shoulder legal costs of £200,000, potentially pushing some out of business and adding further costs to the FSCS.

Experts question whether the court will even allow firms struggling with such costs to become lead defendants.  

If this is a new bullying tactic to force smaller firms chosen as the new lead defendants to settle, then it is a regrettable way for the FSCS to be acting.

It may have a duty to chase achievable recoveries on behalf of levypayers who have to stump up considerable sums to fund it.

But with £30m of costs now associated with the legal fight to recover a possible £75m, and huge discounts already offered to firms who have settled, it is hard to see how continuing this battle is acting in their best interests.

If the main motive for continuing this action is to save face, as it appears, then it’s time the action was dropped.

All roads lead to tax relief reform 

Pensions tax relief is in the sights of politicians from all the major parties.

In an interview with MM this week, Liberal Democrat pensions minister Steve Webb suggests his party may propose a flat-rate of relief of less than 30 per cent.

Labour is sticking with its horrendously complex plan to restrict relief at the highest tax band to 20 per cent, a policy Webb is right to brand “utter nonsense”. If Labour wants further restrictions under the current regime, then further annual allowance cuts would be much simpler.  

The Conservatives are being coy although significant reform may be on their agenda. The Treasury select committee, chaired by senior Conservative backbencher Andrew Tyrie, recently floated the merger of pension and Isa regimes, signalling where the political debate may be moving. Those calling for no more meddling with pensions are likely to be disappointed whoever gains power next May.

Paul McMIllan is group editor at Money Marketing- follow him on twitter here 

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 6 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. On the Pensions tax relief portion.
    Different clowns performing in the same circus I think.
    Clear thinking is a thing of the past it appears.

  2. Julian Stevens 15th May 2014 at 3:56 pm

    The LibDems aren’t going to achieve any sort of majority at the next election so we can discount Webb’s proposed attack on levels of tax relief. They’re illogical and unjust anyway. If you’re in that income bracket, then why shouldn’t you be able to claim relief on contributions to a pension fund, just like everyone else on the basic rate?

    Please God we don’t get another Labour Government EVER. I’m no great fan of any political party but it can’t be denied that the Conservatives appear to have sorted out the economic bomb site they inherited and they’ve even done away with the compulsory annuity rates trap at retirement, albeit without putting anything in its place, which seems to be a leap from one extreme to the other.

  3. Yes, clever of the Tories to sort out all those ‘economic bomb sites’ Labour created – in Greece, Italy, Spain, Ireland….

    And the way George Osborne has fixed the mess Brown & Balls created at Lehman Brothers, and all those dodgy derivatives they invented for traders on Wall Street to sell!

  4. Julian are you Dave Cameron in disguise ???????

  5. Julian Stevens 16th May 2014 at 2:32 pm

    Hardly ~ why, are you a committed Leftie?

  6. “No more boom or bust!” now who was it who said that?

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com