View more on these topics

FSA’s Turner slams “massively negative” shadow banking system

turner.gif

FSA chairman Adair Turner has mounted an attack on the shadow banking system, laying the bulk of the blame for the financial crisis at its door.

Presenting the annual Rostov Lecture on International Affairs at John Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies, Turner examined the role of securitisation, shadow banking and the value of financial innovation.

Turner says securitisation – or the creation of pooled credit securities from multiple underlying loans – “might have had some potential to be a useful financial innovation” but added that its role in the shadow banking system was “inherently dangerous”.

‘Shadow banking’, as defined by the Financial Stability Board, covers credit intermediation taking place outside or partially outside the traditional banking system, but involving the defining characteristics of banking such as maturity transformation and leverage.

This system expanded rapidly in the 30 or so years before the financial crisis, Turner pointed out, driven in part by the rise of securitised credit – which also started to take increasingly complex forms.

“Any macro-level counter factual analysis of the impact of the whole package of innovations which contributed to shadow banking would, I think, clearly illustrate that if we had to choose between having the whole package and none of it, we would have been better off with none of it – no [structured investment vehicles], no [collateralised debt obligations], no credit derivatives,” Turner says.

“Even if it could be proven, which is still unclear, that in some way this package did deliver the market completion and allocative efficiency benefits ascribed to it ahead of the crisis, there seems no possibility that the scale of that benefit – measured at the macro level as an increase in the obtainable level of income across the economy – could be more than a small fraction of the harm produced by the induced financial instability effect.”

Turner adds that the macro impact of the overall package of shadow banking innovation is “massively negative”, having led to an unsustainable credit boom followed by recession, negative equity and unemployment.

“It is difficult to think of any wave of innovations in any other sector of the economy about which we would be likely to reach such a negative judgement,” he concludes.

Recommended

First-time buyer numbers up 8% in February

Lending to both first-time buyers and home movers increased in February with first-time buyers taking the bigger increase, according to figures released today from the Council of Mortgage Lenders. Some 14,100 loans worth £1.7bn were taken out by first-time buyers, up 8 per cent by number and 6 per cent by value from January and […]

Aviva Investors chief exec to step down

Aviva Investors chief executive Alain Dromer is leaving the company as part of a wider global restructure of the Aviva business. Aviva says its will recruiting a successor to Dromer (pictured) who will report to Aviva group chief finance officer Pat Regan. Regan will continue in his role as chief finance officer and will assume […]

8

Standard Life offers higher annuity rates to its pension customers

Standard Life is offering its own pension customers a higher standard annuity rate. The provider has contacted advisers notifying them of improvements in the standard annuity rates offered to existing Active Money Sipp, Wrap Sipp and Pension Fund Withdrawal Plan customers. The offer is only being made to customers who have been with Standard Life […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Nothing like burning your bridges, eh, Adair?

  2. Hindsight is such a wonderful thing. If you are so clever Mr Turner why didnt you take action when at the FSA?

  3. The mans a fool !!

    Was,nt you and Hector looking the other way (TCF &RDR) to notice the crash behind you.

    Slippery eel looking to blame some-one or some thing else.

  4. So who was responsible for regulating shadow banking and got paid massive bonuses for doing such a good job?

  5. Hindsight is such a brilliant tool for regulation, especially if you wish to find others to blame. It is also invaluable in allowing the Regulator to devise techniques for avoiding the last crisis.
    Do they really not realise the contempt they generate from such pronouncements

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com