View more on these topics

FSA wealth manager warning: 80% of files show risk of unsuitable service

The FSA has sent a Dear CEO letter to wealth management firms after it found 80 per cent of files it reviewed presented a high risk of unsuitable service.

Speaking at the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment’s annual conference in London today, FSA director of conduct policy Sheila Nicoll (pictured) said the Dear CEO letter followed a review the FSA carried out of files from 16 wealth management firms.

She said four out of five of the files reviewed had a high risk of unsuitability or the suitability could not be determined.

Out of the 16 firms, 14 were judged to pose either a high risk or medium risk of detriment to their customers. The FSA says wealth management firms offer different business models and the research looked at a range of businesses from major international private banks to domestically focused and privately held firms.

Over two thirds of files were either inconsistent with firms’ models or with clients’ attitude to risk.

Nicoll said in some cases firms were unable to demonstrate suitability in line with know your customer requirements, or were using out of date customer information.

The FSA also found that firms were unable to demonstrate that client portfolios were suitable due to inadequate risk profiling, some firms not implementing Mifid client classification requirements, and lack of a record of clients’ financial situation.

Nicoll said a number of the firms reviewed are facing regulatory action and the FSA will carry out follow up work later this year.

Firms that have received the letter have to respond to the FSA saying they have understood the letter’s contents by August 9.

The FSA suggests that firms may want to consider sampling client files, and assessing whether the client portfolios and the current holdings are suitable based on the documented client information held.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 8 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. execution only beckons

  2. ha, ha – this is hilarious. Does the news flow get any better for these jokers? Inability to skim client cash accounts for interest, requirement for “fund managers” to have qualifications etc – I know one CEO of a discretionary fund management company (quite large) who like to think of themselves as “the premier brand in DFM” – he doesn’t even have a degree!! So no surprise that 80% have a paltry grasp of risk

  3. She obviously finds it funny!

  4. Given the size of her wage packet, she should get her teeth done.

    your thoughts!

  5. It just goes on and on !

    The answer is to go ‘execution-only’ or simply advise every client to go into NS&I, building society deposits and guaranteed structures backed by government. Then, when the whole economy collapses due to a lack of funding to industry and commerce by private investors, the FSA will eventually be seen for what it is – a bunch of clowns.

  6. What took them so long? We’ve known of this for years, just speak to an “investment adviser” at any DFM. Recommend a buy and sell,sweep up the commission, no need to know your client!
    jobs a good’n

  7. On top of everything, the best they manage is to carefully track an Index or some other spurious “benchmark”-eg APCIMS.

    Why bother ?

Leave a comment