View more on these topics

FSA to scrutinize non-executive directors

Non-executive directors of firms are likely to come under closer scrutiny from the FSA after it announced proposed amendments to the FSA handbook.

In a consultation paper published today, the regulator outlines proposals to extend the approved persons regime and sets out how the FSA is enhancing its scrutiny of senior management competence.

The FSA’s proposals include extending the definition of the existing director and non-executive director controlled functions to include certain individuals in parent companies.

The regulator is also looking to clarify the role of non-executive directors to reinforce that it will look at non-executives more closely where it believes they should have intervened more actively with a firm’s management.

The proposals also seek to extend the definition of the CF29, significant management function, to include all proprietary traders where they can exert a significant influence over a firm.

The FSA says it will also amend the application of the approved persons regime to UK branches of overseas firms based outside the EEA.

As part of this work, the FSA says it has already started to interview more applicants for “significant influence” posts at high impact firms. Once in post, where individuals fail to meet the required standards the FSA says it will consider enforcement action.

Director of permissions, decisions and reporting division Graeme Ashley-Fenn says: “It is critical not just for the firm but for market confidence that our major institutions are soundly run by individuals who have clearly demonstrated that they have the necessary skills, experience and integrity.

“Our vetting process is not intended to be a substitute for a firm undertaking proper due diligence itself – responsibility for this still lies with a firm’s senior management. These proposals align with a shift in FSA focus: where a significant influence holder shows incompetence or dishonesty, we will consider enforcement action against him or her.”

The consultation period closes on March 31. The FSA says it will finalise the proposals and publish revised rules in a policy statement during the second quarter of 2009.


New model barmy

The FSA’s planned changes to the capital adequacy requirements show an inherent bias in favour of old-style firms and against new-style and financial planning models. I am sure this bias is unintended, as it is contrary to all other recent work by the regulator.

Split decision

Risk is always subjective. Years ago, zeros were deemed low risk but they turned out to be anything but. Yet now it has emerged that the Financial Services Compensation Scheme has different ideas.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm