View more on these topics

FSA stringency on Sipps will hurt smaller players

The FSA’s plans to increase capital adequacy requirements for Sipp firms could drive further consolidation in the market as small providers struggle to compete under the new regime.

Last week, Money Marketing revealed the regulator has started alerting providers about its plans to increase the amount of capital that Sipp firms need to hold as the products become more mainstream.

Currently, Sipp providers are required to hold reserves equal to at least six weeks of annual audited expenditure.

Suffolk Life head of marketing Greg Kingston says he expects the regulator to increase the level to 10 weeks of annual audited expenditure, with a view to further raising the bar to 13 weeks by the end of 2013.

He says: “Our legal structure dictates that Suffolk Life is required to hold capital of 13 weeks of annual audited expenditure, whereas the current requirement for some other Sipp firms is just six weeks.

“But Sipps are no longer a niche product, so it was inevitable that providers would have to adhere to increased regulation. It is likely, however, that this move will hurt the smaller players in the long run and could fuel industry consolidation.”

Last week, Money Marketing revealed Sipp specialist Hornbuckle Mitchell is searching for an external investor amid fears that the capital adequacy rise will hinder its growth plans.

Managing director David White says: “The FSA is right to do this because six weeks is not sufficient to wind a company down if there is a major issue.

“This will put pressure on the smaller Sipp providers and consolidation will accelerate. I think the FSA would like to see the number of providers reduce from 120 to about 20.”

Hargreaves Lansdown head of pensions research Tom McPhail says increased regulation in the Sipp market was inevitable, given the increased popularity of the products.

He says: “It is appropriate that the FSA is doing this but it is likely to put pressure on specialist Sipp operators. Larger operators, wealth management firms and the big insurers will be able to absorb this, but for smaller firms whose principal activity is Sipps, it could have a big impact.”


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Once again the FSA is getting mixed up with the idea that big is best.

    Didn’t it learn anything from the banks?

  2. I disagree with the comment about the banks – it is the smaller, less regulated providers that cause so many problems. It is too specialised an area to NOT have the financial back up and protection, especially with the increase in esoteric investments. If you dont have the financial backing, this isnt the market for you. End of!

  3. Hyman Wolanski (MD, Sippchoice) 10th June 2011 at 4:50 pm

    Why should any change to the capital adequacy requirements be more of a problem for smaller SIPP providers than larger ones. Clearly, not all SIPP providers are equal but please treat each provider on its own merits and stop trying to create an artificial distinction between ‘small’ and ‘large’ SIPP providers For what it’s worth, my company is a small SIPP provider and we would be able to meet increased capital adequacy requirements without needing an external investor. Based on your article, not all large SIPP providers can make the same statement!

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm