View more on these topics

FSA sets out how FCA will deal with super-complaints

FSA Sky 480

The FSA has set out its proposals for handling super-complaints brought by consumer bodies and reports of regulatory failings by firms and the Financial Ombudsman Service.

The regulator published a guidance consultation yesterday on how the new regulator the Financial Conduct Authority will handle super-complaints and references. Super-complaints can be brought by designated consumer bodies which allege that particular parts or features of the financial services market are significantly damaging the interests of consumers. Similarly, firms and the FOS can make references to the FCA under section 234D of the Financial Services Act 2012 alleging there has been a failure by a regulated firm which is leading to consumer detriment.

The guidance outlines the evidence needed to support super-complaints and references, and how these will be handled by the FCA.

Super-complaints need to relate to the UK financial services market. Cross-border issues affecting consumers in the UK or involve UK firms will be in scope, but not issues solely affecting consumers in overseas jurisdictions.

Consumer bodies bringing super-complaints will need to include details about how a particular part of the market is damaging consumer interests, setting out the extent of any damage, how this has been calculated, and what outcome the consumer body wants to see as a result of the super-complaint.

They will need to back up their claims with documented facts and evidence on practices such as high-pressure sales tactics, exit or switching costs, whether the relevant product or service is only available as part of a package of products or services, and whether claims would be covered by the FOS and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

When firms or the FOS wish to make a reference to the FCA they will need to establish a regulated person or persons has demonstrated a “regular failure” to comply with regulatory requirements. For the reference to be considered the regular failure needs have resulted in a consumer loss which would be remedied in the courts if the client brought legal proceedings or result in an upheld FOS complaint.

The FCA will be required to respond to a super-complaint or reference within 90 days setting out how it proposes to deal with the allegations and what action, if any, it has decided to take. Before it decides on further action the FCA may carry out wider enquiries such as internal research, public requests for information, and may carry out thematic work.

Possible outcomes include enforcement action, initiating a consumer redress scheme, and reviewing relevant rules or guidance.

The FCA has the power to dismiss super-complaints or decline to respond to references where they are “unfounded, frivolous or vexatious”.

The FSA says it is up to consumer bodies, firms and the FOS to decide whether to publicise whether a super-complaint or reference has been made. But the FSA says complainants should consult with the FCA “to avoid jeopardising investigations that could be hampered by public disclosure”.

The consultation closes on 18 March.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. What about a super complaint about what a mess the FSA has made

  2. What’s the point of having a Super Complaint procedure to highlight problems in Financial Services when the FSA takes little notice of what people in the industry are saying on a regular basis.

    I have written to the regulator on a number of occasions about companies advertising financial advise services when in fact they are lead generation firms and have no authorisation.

    We have even complained about adverts posted by these companies claiming free financial advice when in fact they are selling data to IFA’s.

    The fact is, whatever procedure you have for dealing with complaints, it has to be speedy and seen to work because at present, the whistle blowing system is totally inadequate.

    I wonder what would happen if somebody set themselves up as a solicitor without the correct qualifications, how quick would the SRA take action?

    The FSA are always about 5 years behind where everybody else is and needs to be ahead of the game rather than behind it, they also need to start protecting the IFA profession and close down illegal lead generation sites.

  3. RegulatorSaurusRex 20th February 2013 at 7:48 am

    Why am I extinct? What is the point of changing the name and all the literature regulated firms are compelled to have?

    Why is the FSA involved in the process of deciding how the renamed regulator handles ‘super complaints’ when the FSA failed so spectacularly which in turn is the reason why all this ‘change for the sake of change’ is doing the rounds yet again?

    If I wasn’t extinct I would see the doctor for a prescription for something to calm me down.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm