View more on these topics

FSA PPI rules to cost up to £3.2bn

The FSA has finalised rules that will force companies selling payment protection insurance to improve their complaints handling processes, which could cost firms £3.2bn.

In a policy statement published today, the FSA has published new handbook guidance to ensure complaints are handled properly and appropriate redress is offered.

The FSA has also published an explanation of when and why firms should analyse their past complaints to identify if there are serious flaws in sales practices and an open letter setting out common sales failings to help firms identify bad practice.

The regulator says it expects firms to retain records of their root cause assessment of PPI sales problems and failings, their considerations and decisions about whether and what own initiative actions are required as a result and the scope, nature and results of the actions taken, including any dealings with individual consumers.

The FSA says it will draw on these records in the course of its monitoring work.

The FSA estimates that the cost of the new Handbook provisions to the industry over the next five years will be between £0.8bn and £1.3bn.

It estimates that the cost to the industry of the wider package of measures, mainly concerning firms’ actions to offer redress to consumers who have not complained, is between £1.1bn and £3.2bn.

Firms must implement the measures by December 1, 2010.

The FSA says it is also considering extending the time limit consumers have for referring a PPI complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service following receipt of a firm’s final response letter.

FSA director of conduct risk Dan Waters says: “Today is the culmination of months of hard work and now, with these measures, we look forward to consumers being treated fairly whether they are buying or complaining about PPI.

“Since we took over the regulation of PPI we have carried out 24 investigations and three thematic reviews, issued warnings, halted the selling of single premium PPI with unsecured personal loans, visited over 200 firms and handed out some very significant fines. Now, with this package of measures we are confident we can mend a market that has been broken for too long.

“This remedy is fair to consumers and the industry alike. The onus is now on the industry to ensure it treats all customers fairly. We will be monitoring the implementation of our guidance closely to ensure real change is delivered.”

Which? chief executive Peter Vicary-Smith has called for an industry-wide review of past complaints relating to PPI sales.

He says: “For years, the industry has handled poorly thousands of PPI complaints so it is important that the FSA is able to force firms to review old cases.

“We want the Government to act swiftly and activate the FSA’s power to force lenders to review rejected PPI cases so consumers whose complaints were wrongly dismissed can get the redress they are due.”


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. “The FSA estimates that the cost of the new Handbook provisions to the industry over the next five years will be between £0.8bn and £1.3bn.”

    Whaaat? Between £800 and £1,300 MILLION quid just for observing a set of good practice rules in respect of ONE product?

    How much did this handbook cost to compile? How voluminous does a handbook on good sales practice for a single product need to be? How can it POSSIBLY need to be any thicker than 50 pages, at most?

    If it wasn’t such tragic farce, you’d have to laugh at the FSA’s truly incredible capacity for blowing monumental sums of other peoples’ money.

  2. Like the article says: “[The FSA] estimates that the cost to the industry … mainly concerning firms’ actions to offer redress to consumers … is between £1.1bn and £3.2bn”

  3. I offered them a simple solution, one that works with all products and could prevent the need for complaints in the first place.

    It was so cheap all it would cost is a sheet of A4 paper at point of sale.

    Too simple was it?

    Frustrating stuff.

  4. Can Which? Chief Executive Peter Vicary-Smith please clarify which industry he is referring to:
    Unsecured/Secured Loan Providers?
    Mortgage Brokers?
    Independent Financial Advisers?

    This is a typical sweeping statement that does no one any good.

    I have just read an article about an ex police detective being convicted of fraud – does that mean that we should have a review of all court cases as based on this premise a lot of the evidence used might be suspect as no police officers can be trusted.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm